Fresh from his contemptible showing at The Heritage Foundation late last year, big-noting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsieh Kuo-liang (謝國樑) has proven, once again, that Taiwan’s judicial system is unraveling, step by step, piece by piece.
Every week — literally — there have been developments indicating that whatever judicial integrity came to pass during the presidencies of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is now subject to a process of politicization, manipulation and regression. Even the pro-KMT press has stopped in its tracks, regularly airing expert opinion that asks whether things are out of control.
The question now appears not to be if the judiciary’s credibility will collapse altogether, but when and how.
Yesterday we said that Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) acted utterly inappropriately in condoning the actions of prosecutors who mocked Chen during an asinine and prejudicial skit celebrating Law Day.
Compounding this extraordinary situation, last week saw the introduction of draft legislation that would allow the formation of investigative legislative panels with powers that would injure the credibility of the judiciary even further and weaken or dissolve the crucial barriers that separate the powers of the state.
Hsieh is the head of the legislature’s committee that deals with judicial matters — and which contains members who threaten dissenting judges with legal action. Unlike in countries where such positions require expertise and gravitas, Taiwan seems to specialize in filling these posts with party hacks of the lowest conceivable caliber. These politicians’ role is not to defend the integrity of the system, but to usurp it and exploit its weaknesses for the benefit of party benefactors.
There is no other explanation for how Hsieh can escape censure and punishment for his prejudicial comments, for example, on the Chen trial during his Heritage Foundation talk.
The legislation that Hsieh’s committee would now introduce is so destabilizing, wide-ranging and risible that even the KMT-controlled Cabinet, the Judicial Yuan and the Control Yuan have expressed reservations at the direction this legislature of goons is taking.
The KMT legislative caucus wants to be able to compel public servants to submit to its probes regardless of their motivation, appropriateness or whether existing channels of investigation and punishment would be displaced or interfered with in the process. The bill is an expanded rehash of that which allowed the legislature to “investigate” Chen’s shooting in 2004, and which was rightly declared unconstitutional.
It is essential that this predatory piece of draft legislation be opposed at every turn. But if it passes a third reading, its constitutionality must then be tested in an appeal to the Council of Grand Justices. As crusty and as unpredictable as the council can be, even it should be able to understand the ramifications of institutionalizing legislative Star Chambers that would intimidate and shackle public servants who don’t toe the line of the majority party.
Notwithstanding the muted concerns of sources at the Ministry of Justice, the only other conclusion — a sad and nerve-racking conclusion — that can be reached is that Minister Wang, with all of her conflicts of interest, evasions, sophomoric word games and Neroic fiddling, retains her post because her ethereal leadership is precisely what is required at this time.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS