Fresh from his contemptible showing at The Heritage Foundation late last year, big-noting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsieh Kuo-liang (謝國樑) has proven, once again, that Taiwan’s judicial system is unraveling, step by step, piece by piece.
Every week — literally — there have been developments indicating that whatever judicial integrity came to pass during the presidencies of Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is now subject to a process of politicization, manipulation and regression. Even the pro-KMT press has stopped in its tracks, regularly airing expert opinion that asks whether things are out of control.
The question now appears not to be if the judiciary’s credibility will collapse altogether, but when and how.
Yesterday we said that Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) acted utterly inappropriately in condoning the actions of prosecutors who mocked Chen during an asinine and prejudicial skit celebrating Law Day.
Compounding this extraordinary situation, last week saw the introduction of draft legislation that would allow the formation of investigative legislative panels with powers that would injure the credibility of the judiciary even further and weaken or dissolve the crucial barriers that separate the powers of the state.
Hsieh is the head of the legislature’s committee that deals with judicial matters — and which contains members who threaten dissenting judges with legal action. Unlike in countries where such positions require expertise and gravitas, Taiwan seems to specialize in filling these posts with party hacks of the lowest conceivable caliber. These politicians’ role is not to defend the integrity of the system, but to usurp it and exploit its weaknesses for the benefit of party benefactors.
There is no other explanation for how Hsieh can escape censure and punishment for his prejudicial comments, for example, on the Chen trial during his Heritage Foundation talk.
The legislation that Hsieh’s committee would now introduce is so destabilizing, wide-ranging and risible that even the KMT-controlled Cabinet, the Judicial Yuan and the Control Yuan have expressed reservations at the direction this legislature of goons is taking.
The KMT legislative caucus wants to be able to compel public servants to submit to its probes regardless of their motivation, appropriateness or whether existing channels of investigation and punishment would be displaced or interfered with in the process. The bill is an expanded rehash of that which allowed the legislature to “investigate” Chen’s shooting in 2004, and which was rightly declared unconstitutional.
It is essential that this predatory piece of draft legislation be opposed at every turn. But if it passes a third reading, its constitutionality must then be tested in an appeal to the Council of Grand Justices. As crusty and as unpredictable as the council can be, even it should be able to understand the ramifications of institutionalizing legislative Star Chambers that would intimidate and shackle public servants who don’t toe the line of the majority party.
Notwithstanding the muted concerns of sources at the Ministry of Justice, the only other conclusion — a sad and nerve-racking conclusion — that can be reached is that Minister Wang, with all of her conflicts of interest, evasions, sophomoric word games and Neroic fiddling, retains her post because her ethereal leadership is precisely what is required at this time.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with