On Dec. 31, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) gave a speech in Beijing to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan.” The basic spirit of the speech was the same as 30 years ago and was aimed at getting Taiwan to surrender to China.
What was the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan” about? The younger generation today does not understand why China issued such a statement and, considering the closed political environment and restricted information flow at the time, not even the older generation have a good grasp of it.
After 1949, China’s Taiwan policy was that Taiwan must be liberated. As a result, there was some military conflict between the two sides. The most serious incident was the 823 Artillery Bombardment that occurred on Aug. 23, 1958, and was instigated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
On Jan. 1, 1979, China issued the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan,” which represented a major Chinese policy change toward a softer attempt at getting Taiwan to willingly surrender. The ferocious CCP suddenly made emotional appeals to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The CCP, which had boasted about how it annihilated 8 million KMT troops and settled the score with “the remaining dregs of the KMT” during the Cultural Revolution before making two foreigners, Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, its spiritual fathers, suddenly turned around and said the KMT and the CCP were all “descendants of the Yellow Emperor” and that “unification” must be achieved to appease “the ancestors.”
The CCP, which forced the KMT to flee to Taiwan and “dealt with” the families of KMT members who remained in China, suddenly said that “Taiwan’s separation from the motherland for nearly 30 years has been artificial and runs against our national interests and aspirations.”
This seemed to imply that the KMT or a third party had caused this “artificial” separation and that China had nothing to do with the matter. I therefore find it sickening to hear China talk about things like the Taiwanese public’s “yearning for their homeland and old friends.”
They are shameless!
In order to understand the total turnaround in the CCP’s attitude, we must understand the historical background. In September 1976, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) died and in August the following year, China announced the end of the Cultural Revolution.
In the CCP’s own words, the Cultural Revolution was “10 years of turmoil” that represented a crisis in terms of belief, trust and confidence, while the economy moved to the verge of collapse.
Unable to “liberate” Taiwan by military means, China had to change its strategy to one of “tricking” Taiwan. This two-pronged strategy has since been used frequently by China.
To trick everyone, China said in its “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan” that “the Chinese government has ordered the People’s Liberation Army to stop the bombardment of Kinmen and other islands starting today” and it declared that this represented an end to military confrontation between China and Taiwan.
This was a way for China to save face, because US intervention in the 823 Artillery Bombardment caused China to shrink back, which ended the dream of “liberating” Taiwan.
Mao’s idea of bombarding Kinmen every second day was fresh at first, but soon lost any innovative value. In addition, to appease the US, China launched a war on Vietnam to punish it for strengthening ties with the Soviet Union. It also supported the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. There was a possibility that the Soviet Union would come to the assistance of Vietnam and so China pulled out of the cross-strait bombardment.
Lets move on to the international situation. In 1972, Mao invited then-US president Richard Nixon to China because the struggle between China and the Soviet Union for leadership of the international communist movement had developed into minor military scuffles. Mao worried that the Soviet Union would use nuclear weapons, and he therefore changed policy from opposing imperialism, revisionism and reactionaries to one of trying to co-opt the US imperialists and the KMT reactionaries to counter Soviet revisionism.
However, US imperialism and the reactionary KMT were two different things. The CCP and the US established diplomatic relations on Jan. 1, 1979, which led to the US ending diplomatic relations with Taiwan — a heavy blow to the KMT.
At the same time, the CCP chose to issue its “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan” to curry favor with the KMT in a perfect example of how the CCP uses a ruthless two-pronged approach.
On Sept. 30, 1981, Chinese head of state Ye Jianying (葉劍英) proposed his nine principles, for the first time officially calling for peaceful unification with Taiwan.
But since then, China has often issued military threats against Taiwan and now has more than 1,000 missiles aimed at the nation. It seems that the end of cross-strait military confrontation that China talks about refers only to replacing cannons with missiles.
Hu is at his lying best again, using more despotic rhetoric than ever before. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), however, sees it as “new thinking,” as if he were willing to convince the people of Taiwan into surrendering.
Ma’s behavior is more shameless than that of former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and former presidents Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US