IOC blaming Tibetans?
In his year-end reflections on the Beijing Olympics, International Olympics Committee (IOC) president Jacques Rogge blamed Tibetans for the difficulties faced by the IOC in dealing with the Chinese government (“IOC was surprised by Tibet unrest, Rogge says,” Jan. 1, page 20). At a time when the violent conflict in the Middle East continues to escalate and the need for peaceful reconciliation is ever more urgent, it is irresponsible and inaccurate to accuse the Tibetans of turning to violence and “bloody unrest.”
The overwhelming majority of more than 130 protests against Chinese rule that swept across Tibet last year were peaceful, largely because of the example led by the Tibetans’ exiled leader — Nobel Peace Laureate the Dalai Lama — and the influence of Tibetan Buddhist culture. But the crackdown against them by the Chinese government was brutal.
Rogge’s comments are in line with Beijing’s propaganda, which seeks to represent the six-month cycle of largely peaceful dissent in Tibet as one violent riot in March.
The reality is that last year, Tibetans risked their lives to convey the message to the outside world that the Dalai Lama represents their interests, not the Chinese state, and to express their resentment against repressive policies undermining their religion and culture. In response, the Chinese government resorted to repressive and heavy-handed tactics that owe more to the political extremism and paranoia of the Maoist era than to a 21st century would-be superpower.
KATE SAUNDERS
Washington, DC
Chiu Yi’s ‘boring’ comment
I have to admit to being utterly speechless and dumbfounded to read the words spoken by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅). In what I can only assume to be an effort to console KMT Legislator Diane Lee (李慶安), Chiu said the job of legislator was “boring anyway,” and that she could take heart in the knowledge that she could do better in other fields (“Diane Lee quits KMT over dual citizenship scandal,” Dec. 31, 2008, page 1).
What sheer idiocy to make such a public statement. How heartless and base to utter such words! At best, this person is hopelessly out of touch with the every day world.
As if governing some 23 million people could be considered “boring” — especially during an economic crisis when many people have lost their jobs and some are having difficulties even putting food on the table.
There are many, many people who would gladly work very hard for one-eighth the wages earned by a legislator. Perhaps Chiu might give some thought and consideration to their plight.
It is a total disgrace, and even a little perverse, for Chiu — with his extremely high-paying sinecure post — to pronounce such risable inanities. Does Chiu seriously expect any pity for himself or for Lee? Can anyone in their right mind view such a notion tenable in the least bit? I have absolutely no pity for either Lee or Chiu.
With their sinecure positions and numerous privileges, Taiwanese legislators are among the highest paid in the world. And yet, all too often, certain members among their ranks brawl like drunken sailors on shore leave and in brothels, or like chimpazees in a zoo. Here in the US, Taiwanese legislative sessions serve as nightly entertainment on television, with snide commentary provided.
Perhaps if Chiu were to use a infinitesimally small portion of his brain, he could come up with some ideas to make his sinecure post less “boring.” For example, I can think of many things along the lines of social welfare and civil liberties. How about struggling for the dignity of Taiwan? In other words, perhaps he should make an attempt to do the job he was elected for.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS