The forest of white windmills that make up Asia’s largest wind farm can be seen from miles away. Dotted across 2,000km2 of hills and villages on a basalt plateau in western India sit more than 800 turbines — generating more than 1,000 megawatts of electricity.
The towering machines, which stand 80m tall, cast shadows across fields tilled by man and buffalo — a stark juxtaposition of ancient and modern India. For one man, however, the windmill farm in Dhule is a fitting riposte to the critics who derided his dream to build a global green energy business from a country plagued by crippling power cuts.
In little more than a decade, Tulsi Tanti has made Suzlon Energy into the world’s fifth-largest producer of wind turbines — selling its turbines at a couple of million dollars apiece. Company turnover last year increased 29 percent to US$1.8 billion. About 90 percent of Suzlon’s order book is from markets outside India, largely the US, South America and China.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Despite the success, last year was an annus horribilis for the company. While Suzlon should have been reaping the benefits of a world hungry for clean energy, it has been hit by a triple whammy: The credit crunch sent its stock plummeting; cracks appeared in its rotor blades used by US customers, raising doubts over its technology; and the US$1.6 billion acquisition of Germany’s Repower, a turbine maker that produces giant offshore rigs, stalled.
The turbulence has hit the company hard. Suzlon’s stock price has crashed 90 percent since January last year to end up trading at just 56 rupees (US$1.20) last month — valuing the Tanti family’s 66 percent stake at US$1.6 billion.
Tanti brushes aside these episodes, seeing opportunities where others see crisis. In an interview from his Mumbai office, the 51-year-old concedes his paper fortune has been blown away by the economic storm but says the forecast for the company remains good.
Wind power producers can’t keep pace with demand at a time when concern about global warming is driving governments to promote greener electricity, he said.
“Our final product is electricity and that is sold at a fixed price. Demand is growing at 5 percent a year globally and you need [wind power] to prevent climate change and for energy security. It’s the only industry that is going to grow,” he said.
Tanti’s rationale is about demand and supply. He says that by 2020, the US, Europe, China and India will want to have 20 percent of their power supply from renewables. The issue is about making wind power “cost competitive” with carbon sources, especially coal, which fuels 65 percent of India’s electricity and costs at least a quarter less.
“Today wind power is just 1 percent of supply. It can grow to 7 percent by 2020. That is the maximum because industry has to find resources, material and execute projects. With greater volumes the price [of wind power] will drop ... and [governments] will ask what is the cost for pollution from carbon fuels. You will need a carbon tax,” he said.
More worrying perhaps were the questions raised about Suzlon’s key technologies. In June, Edison International, one of Suzlon’s biggest customers in the US, canceled an order for 150 turbines after cracks appeared in the rotor blades. Many began to fret — and were only reassured when the Indian company shipped out new turbines made of reinforced plastic.
Tanti says these incidents are “nothing new” for an emerging technology and that retrofitting 400 turbines in the US was the first “stiffness problem” encountered in more than a dozen years of business. The cost is only US$60 million, he says, pointing out that competitors have put aside similar amounts in previous years.
Suzlon’s biggest acquisition has been a rollercoaster ride. The Indian company won a bidding war with French nuclear power group Areva with a US$1.6 billion offer for Repower, a maker of huge wind turbines.
However, the deal remains in limbo after Suzlon’s initial financing deal fell apart as markets crumbled. Late last month, the company announced it would pay 270 million euros to increase its stake to 91 percent, the requirement under German law to control the company. Tanti expects to be in charge early this year.
Repower is key to Suzlon’s global strategy. Tanti said that by 2020, there would be only five to six global players, and to survive Suzlon needed to be big in the US, Europe and Asia. Tanti’s logic was that unlike in the US and Asia, where land is plentiful, in Europe he would need giant offshore wind turbines to produce electricity. Repower’s 5MW generator — double the power output of Suzlon’s biggest turbine — is 100m tall and has a rotor diameter of 126m, about two football pitches. It can only be serviced using a helicopter.
Coupled with this technology and a cost base which is 19 percent lower than the European company, Tanti says he can grow Repower’s business five-fold in a short span.
“It will take three of four years to develop this technology and we need access to European offshore markets. We can reduce the company’s cost and increase their margins and unlock value here,” he said.
Few people would bet against Tanti. In 1994 he ran a textile business and bought two wind turbines to power his factories after becoming frustrated with India’s high-cost, erratic electricity supply. Tanti, a trained mechanical engineer, became fascinated by the economics and technology involved.
In the 1990s, Western firms had little interest in India and Tanti spotted a gap in the market. He decided to leave textiles and began installing and servicing wind turbines for fast-growing companies in India. By the late 1990s he had built up a large domestic business, partly through convincing state governments to adopt a friendly tax regime for green power.
It is here that Suzlon’s ascent starts, a story of a canny developing world entrepreneur who saw that India’s cheap but highly trained work force could undercut rivals abroad. His next move was into manufacturing.
Tanti scoured the world for talent and innovations, buying up mainly European expertise. By 2000 he had set up a German research center and bought AE-Rotor Techniek, a bankrupt Dutch company, to design rotor blades. With foreign money flowing into India, he floated Suzlon in 2005, raising US$338 million and began expanding through acquisitions.
A year later Suzlon bought Belgium’s Hansen Transmissions, a maker of turbine gearboxes, for US$566 million. Hansen was a key acquisition — Suzlon got its hands on a component that was in short supply. Tanti sold 28 percent of Hansen’s stock on the London Stock Exchange, gaining a valuation of more than five times its purchase price.
There’s no doubting Tanti’s global reach. The family joined forces with Arcapita, a Bahrain-based investment bank, to buy China’s Honiton Energy in 2006.
He aims to build Asia’s largest wind farm, exceeding his Indian one in size, in Inner Mongolia that will generate 1,650MW of wind power.
The Chinese investment will total more than US$2 billion.
“China has the will to do this. The Chinese government has said it wants 100,000MW to come from wind. The country has a large potential of 250,000MW. That is why we have our manufacturing there. We are a Chinese local company too,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US