The last couple of months of baseball in Asia provided followers with a glimpse of the problems confronting the professional game in the Pacific Rim, as well as the possibilities and benefits that would arise from the creation of a pan-Asian major league consisting of pro teams from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and China.
Last month’s Konami Cup — a competitive but ultimately meaningless annual exhibition series featuring champion teams from Japan’s NPB, Korea’s KBO, China’s CBL and Taiwan’s CPBL — showcased Asia’s best pro clubs and highlighted the movement toward international play. But the tourney was played to mostly empty seats, save for a handful of scouts, friends and families of players and a few die-hard fans in the Tokyodome.
Here in Taiwan, this year’s gambling and match-fixing scandal has caused two of the CPBL’s teams to fold, leaving the league on the verge of collapse with just four teams remaining. Meanwhile, Taiwanese fans who will stay awake until 3am or travel halfway across the world just to watch Wang Chien-ming (王建民) pitch a single game can’t be bothered to travel a few hundred meters (or even change the channel) to watch CPBL games.
In Japan, a select few pro teams remain profitable, but most are struggling to stay afloat as fans and baseball brass lament declining interest and an increasing defection of top talent to Major League Baseball (MLB).
At the same time, MLB teams are continuing to comb Asia’s professional leagues and amateur ranks for talent, in some cases signing “agreements” with Asian pro teams that treat them more or less as vassal appendages to the big league clubs. Recently there has been talk of adding an MLB franchise or even an entire division in Asia. But this doesn’t solve the problem for fans of local professional teams and leagues in Asia who want to see quality, homegrown pro baseball.
The question is, with some of the world’s top baseball talent and a huge base of avid, knowledgeable fans, why haven’t Asian professional leagues been able to harness this hunger for baseball into quality professional leagues?
If Asian fans, players and owners want to experience a competitive, exciting and marketable level of pro baseball that can compete with MLB and celebrate Asia’s vast pool of talent, then the answer is to combine the existing teams from the major pro leagues in Asia in a single league.
This would create a legitimate pro league with enough teams to generate genuinely compelling competition. It would significantly enhance the overall quality of baseball in Asia, over time providing a viable alternative to MLB for Asian players and fans, and give fans something real to cheer for at the pro level. It would also help stem the tide of player defections.
In the past year, KBO, CPBL and NPB officials have turned to draconian rules to warn young players away from seeking careers in the US. But these officials miss the point: Instead of punishing players for seeking careers in a more competitive and lucrative league, they need to create a viable alternative in Asia that gives them real incentive to stay at home.
What parents would want their prodigy to join a four-team league that can fold at any minute when he could try his hand at MLB? What fans would sit in a near-empty stadium watching the same small number of clubs compete year after year?
Consider, then, the excitement that new cross-strait and regional rivalries would generate. How would nationalist tensions among Asian nations play out on the field? Imagine if the Hanshin Tigers came to play the Uni-President Lions in Taiwan in a game that meant something and had playoff implications. The stands would fill and a new taste for competition and rivalry would emerge.
Marketing possibilities and TV revenue would grow exponentially across Asia if the leagues were consolidated and adequately promoted. People would actually want to pay to see games where something was at stake.
As US interest grows in the game overseas, Asia league games could be broadcast late at night on ESPN in the US instead of reruns. The World Baseball Classic was wildly popular in the US, and there is no reason to think that an Asian pro league would not be just as successful, given the level of talent that Asia boasts.
LOGISTICS
Whether or not an Asian league would be sponsored by MLB or function independently remains to be seen. In practical terms, consolidation would not be difficult to accomplish if the will were there.
Taiwan’s CPBL and Korea’s KBO have four and eight teams respectively. Japan’s NPB has 14 clubs. China’s CBL has six.
It would be easy to divide teams into two leagues, just like MLB. The Japanese league, for example, could be like the National League in the US. The teams in this league would continue to play each other as they do now. Then, the KBO, the CPBL and the CBL could merge into a single league like the American League. The KBO could consist of one division and the CPBL and CBL teams the other.
As with MLB fixtures, inter-league play could be limited to a handful of games for marketing purposes, thus minimizing travel costs, while the majority of games would be played within divisions that align geographically and preserve current rivalries.
Playoffs would then involve the winners of each league in a pan-Asian series. This would replace meaningless exhibition matches such as the Konami Cup.
OBSTACLES
There is no question that any plan for an Asian league would encounter many obstacles, and many baseball insiders scoff at the very idea of it. Convincing team owners, who have highly divergent interests, to work together would be a challenge.
Air travel between China, South Korea and Taiwan would be costly. In addition, corporate sponsors of Asian clubs often treat them as advertisements and would be unlikely to buy into such a plan unless it were demonstrated to them that it would be financially worthwhile.
Then there are the archaic owners and entrenched old boys’ networks in the NPB — particularly the Tokyo Giants junta — that would be reluctant to accept change.
At the outset of a unified competition, the top teams in the NPB — and possibly the KBO — would be much stronger than the others, so a more level playing field would have to be created, while limitations on player movement would have to be eased to ensure freer and more equitable distribution of talent.
The biggest obstacle would be national rivalries, language barriers and prejudice. Many people I have interviewed have suggested that a league would not work simply because employees from different countries simply could not cooperate, though this is highly debatable. And, of course, Taiwan would have to address its gambling problem.
Despite these challenges, the benefits that would flow from the formation of a pan-Asian league far outweigh the energy required to overcome obstacles. The idea is still in its early stages, but is already being discussed in baseball circles in Taiwan and Japan among a younger vanguard of officials who recognize the need for improved play in Asia — and who can see past today’s stale situation.
Baseball fans in Asia — who deserve the exciting, competitive atmosphere of professional baseball — would finally profit from a mechanism that would generate a higher level of competition. There would then be a real reason to head out to the ballpark instead of cheering for top hometown players in MLB games.
Most of all, the game would grow and fans in Asia — some of the most knowledgeable and passionate in the world — would see the game go to the next level. The time for change is now.
Jackson Broder is a scout for a Major League Baseball franchise and co-editor of the East Windup Chronicle, a baseball and culture blog.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength