Most teachers would agree with the following: Some days, your students leave you despairing for the future of the society into which they’ll eventually be unleashed, while on other days, they inspire you to believe that there is indeed hope for our collective tomorrow. Not long ago, I had an experience of the latter sort, and I’m still buzzing with excitement about it.
As executive director of the Graduation Pledge Alliance (GPA) in Asia, I regularly meet students, teachers, school staff and administrators to help them explore questions of social responsibility as they relate to students’ choices of careers and jobs and their on-the-job decisionmaking. As a taking-off point, we often use the Graduation Pledge of Social & Environmental Responsibility, which states: “I pledge to explore and take into account the social and environmental consequences of any job I consider and will try to improve these aspects of any organizations for which I work.”
First started in 1987 at Humboldt State University in northern California, the Graduation Pledge is a voluntary oath usually taken at commencement time by tens of thousands of students at well over 100 colleges, universities, professional schools and high schools in a growing number of countries. Much more than a piece of paper signed without thinking, the pledge represents a serious, lifelong personal dedication to make making the world a better place a priority in one’s work, whatever that work may be. By examining themselves and the world around them during their schooling, before graduation, students can develop a sense of empowerment.
Frequently, we hear in conversation or see in the media criticisms of the current crop of Taiwan youth. Members of the “Strawberry Generation” are accused of being soft, pampered and self-absorbed, without a sense of purpose or direction, and of possessing an overmaterialistic drive that leads them to seek get-rich-quick opportunities rather than pursue healthier, more stable career development. Yet the classes of English students I spoke to recently at Chinese Culture University certainly didn’t fit this dire description.
Most students already had clear ideas about the careers they wanted and they knew that there was more to employment than just making money. After group discussions, students said that the purposes of jobs included contributing to one’s organization, making achievements and satisfaction, gaining experience and broadening one’s vision, interacting with people and making friends, living happily with a sense of meaning and giving back to society.
I also asked the students to consider how they could improve the world. While they had good ideas, such as donating money to charity and teaching students about world issues, they were less able to come up with job-specific ideas.
But we shouldn’t judge them harshly for that, as they’ve grown up in a society where most employment has usually been seen as directed solely toward making a living and supporting one’s family. Until recently, Taiwanese workers were urged to just keep their noses to the grindstone, and leave decisions and thoughts about the effects of their work on society and the environment to management and the government.
Now, however, is a time of real hope, because we’re in the midst of several massive global shifts about how individuals, organizations and societies can, and must, live if we are to preserve what’s good in the world, address its numerous problems. This new thinking has gained a foothold in Taiwan and throughout Asia, and the challenge is to develop our visions of a brighter future, find the concepts and resources we’ll need and and join hands with those who share our dreams.
Matt Nicodemus is the executive director of the Graduation Pledge Alliance-Asia Regional Center, Taipei.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers