In the past, if mainstream media did not cover certain incidents, nobody would have known about it. Today, the Wild Strawberry Student Movement has made use of the Internet to link up protesters across the country and created a new force. Nevertheless, the students would be well advised to consider how they could improve their movement.
Traditional media outlets have argued that the Wild Strawberry Student Movement would be difficult to maintain because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) have adopted a strategy of waiting until the demonstrators give up. This is why the student movement has encountered so many setbacks. Distorted and slanderous media coverage of the movement has given rise to biased public opinion toward the group.
The demonstrators should not give up, because their live Internet TV reports highlighted certain problems with traditional media. In particular, the shallow media coverage of the movement failed to clearly represent the three major appeals of the students, which in turn led to a discrepancy between public perception of the movement and reality. That is to say, the public should compare Internet reports with media coverage and form their own opinion based on what they find reliable and believable.
Nobody expected much from a civil movement like the Wild Strawberry movement in the beginning. If professors or experienced student movement activists could have helped design issues to attract public attention and if the students had aggressively created issues using blogs, Internet forums, stickers, Web sites and the Google community, the movement would have been more successful.
I have been a journalist for decades and I have to say that while news tools are constantly changing and becoming more diversified, the primary goal of news should be to remain truthful and get the facts right.
Many students may have had little, if any, experience dealing with the media, but they need not worry, because they have access to tools such as BBS, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. These may seem like small, insignificant things, but these tools can be used as platforms to reach every corner of society. The weeks-long sit-has gained wide recognition both in Taiwan and abroad. This shows how influential new media tools have become.
There are also many examples of smaller groups fighting against larger forces. For example, in February, 4 million Colombians dressed in white T-shirts hit the streets in protest against kidnappings carried out by Colombia’s left-wing guerrilla group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). This protest was planned and mobilized using Facebook. Another example came in March, when a group of bloggers in Taiwan conducted an online fundraising campaign to help save the Losheng Sanatorium from being demolished to make room for a Mass Rapid Transport depot. This group managed to raise NT$200,000 in a single day. The bloggers then placed advertisements in newspapers and called a large protest to save Losheng.
These actions turned the Losheng Sanatorium into a topic for the Democratic Progressive Party in the preliminary presidential debates and forced the government to slow down its plans to demolish it.
These examples show that with perseverance on issues that matter, it is possible to change things. This power can ultimately be used to improve our country.
Let us hope that each member of the Wild Strawberry Student Movement can continue to fight for his or her beliefs.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND DREW CAMERON
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS