So “2630” has been on an official hunger strike for at least a week. I’m referring, of course, to the political artist formerly known as Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), now known fondly by his detention center number.
Yes, the former president has gone from commander-in-chief to complainer-in-clinker. And following the lead of fellow alleged bribee, Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬), to protest the alleged political persecution against him, he ain’t eatin’ nothin’ — not even a tiny bite.
These days that’s no real sacrifice, of course, since most of the stuff on the shelves is China-made, melamine-soaked druck that will give you kidney stones bigger than the bubble-tea tapioca balls from the Shida night market.
These days your odds of good health are probably better on a hunger strike than off.
According to Reuters, Chen was finally hospitalized after 108 hours of non-eating. Said the wire service:
“A doctor on Wednesday determined he was fit enough to return to jail, prosecutor’s spokesman Chen Yun-nan [陳雲南] said.
“‘Our employees will encourage him to eat normally,’ he said.
“But the ex-president will continue to refuse food, his lawyer Cheng Wen-lung [鄭文龍] said, and he is not afraid of dying.”
If he’s really not afraid of dying, he ought to prove it by tucking into a pile of China-made cookies. Now that might convince me he’s innocent.
The snarky cable TV media pointed out how much more comfortable the hospital is then the Tucheng detention center, thus suggesting A-bian was overacting in order to score better digs, as the Filipinos say.
So what will the political fallout of Chen’s case be? That brings us to Vapid Rent-a-Quote of the week, hereby awarded to Tamkang University’s Alexander Huang (黃介正), for the following zinger in Reuters.
Huang allowed: “I have limited knowledge of whether the case would be a minus or a plus for the 2009 elections.”
Wow. Thanks, H-dog, that’s real helpful.
Meanwhile, nearly three weeks into their impassioned protest, the youthful “Wild Strawberries” are looking more and more like the “Wild Dingleberries.” Which is to say, for Ma’s government, they’re irritating, embarrassing and difficult to remove — but, in the larger scheme of things, inconsequential.
This is not to downplay the enthusiasm of these kids. Kudos to them for standing up ... er, sitting down, for Taiwan’s democracy, and putting Ma on notice that he needs to avoid the temptation of reverting to his authoritarian roots. The ’Berries are watching you, buddy.
But what’s with their demands? An apology from Ma and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) for police misconduct and revision of the Parade and Assembly Law?
First off, being prez means never having to say you’re sorry — unless the political benefits outweigh the costs, that is. Second, Ma’s government also favors a degree of revision of the parade law, which kind of takes the bite out of that one.
Again, I love these kids’ pro-liberty spirit, but they’re looking increasingly like that unmade James Dean sequel, “Rebels Without a Well-Thought-Through Cause.”
If you’re going to sit in the rain for a couple weeks — which sucks, by the way — why not put some real teeth on your demands? Like, pizza for every Taiwanese citizen on Wednesdays?
Seriously, though, how about following up on one foreign academic’s suggestion and demanding an independent, blue-ribbon panel of legal experts to investigate the recent Arrest-a-Thon of Democratic Progressive Party figures?
Even more significant, the ’Berries should demand the scrapping of the right to hold anyone without charge for up to four months. As it stands, Taiwanese prosecutors, given a local court’s approval, can jail incommunicado anyone they see fit — thus creating mini-Guantanamo Bays (minus water-boarding) across our good island.
We can call it the “Chabuduo Archipelago.” As in: “Well, they’re probably guilty, so let’s just lock them up until we can figure out exactly why, and maybe we can get the media and talkshow crackpots to find the evidence.”
Alarmingly retro for a 21st-century democracy, don’t you think? Most of my drinking buddies didn’t even know Taiwan’s prosecutors could do this — until the recent detention-fest.
Prosecutors say they need to put suspects in the slammer without charge to prevent them from colluding with other suspects. In other words, they don’t want their pesky targets running around actually talking to other people — as if they were members of a free country with civil liberties or something.
What this means is that old Johnny could be locked up just for writing this column — while prosecutors spend two months locating a translation of “dingleberries” to determine if my use thereof constitutes a criminal act.
But back to Chen. The former prez’s prison diet hasn’t stopped his yappin’. According to the rag now staining your fingers, Chen’s lawyer said Chen had asked about the stock market (“How much money did I lose this week?”), and criticized Ma’s plan to save the economy with vouchers.
Yes, in case you haven’t heard, our economy is contracting faster than a man’s privates after a December dip in the Tamsui. To reverse this alarming trend, we’re all going to get NT$3,600 in vouchers, hopefully by Jan. 19, to spend as we please — on Taiwan Beer, betel nuts, hardcore pornography, whatever.
If all goes to plan, this will give our sadsack economy the swift kick in the keister it so badly needs.
I was thinking of splurging on a new winter-sweater-slash-drool-absorber for the house canine Punkspleen. Unfortunately, my Green Island-wandering gal Cathy Pacific, otherwise known as Household Finances Dominatrix, has already spoken for my bit. Apparently there’s a new “Coach” bag out and her own NT$3,600 won’t cover it.
But what’s 2630 going to do with his vouchers? He’s not eating, so he won’t be able to spend it on Taike Doritos or melamine wafers. Maybe some decoration for his cell — a dark green throwrug, perhaps?
If he’s smart, he’ll donate his NT$3,600 to the Wild Strawberries. Sad to say, this may be his only hope of walking free before Lunar New Year.
Got something to tell Johnny? Go on, get it off your chest. Write to dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com, but be sure to put “Dear Johnny” in the subject line or he’ll mark your bouquets and brickbats as spam.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS