Are the detentions of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), his top aides and former officials appropriate? It’s still too early to tell, because we don’t know if there is clear evidence that those detained were involved in illegal actions, if their involvement was so significant that detention was necessary to prevent collusion, or if it was an attempt to force confessions.
Article 101 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) states that detention shall be ordered if a person is suspected of having committed an offense, if he or she has absconded or if there is sufficient reason to believe that they would abscond, destroy, forge or alter evidence or conspire with a suspected co-offender or witness, making it apparent that there would be difficulties with prosecution, trial or sentencing unless the detention were ordered.
The presumption of innocence requires that suspects be considered innocent until found guilty in a court of third instance. Detention is a substantive punishment and should be a last resort. The question is whether the judiciary and prosecutors adhere strictly to the spirit of the law and human rights requirements when handling cases.
Revenge or anger cause some people to hope that prosecutors and judges will act like the legendary Song Dynasty official Bao Qingtian (包青天) did and swiftly arrest criminals with the same force as Bao used. Indeed, some still use detention as a means to force confessions. This goes against the need to protect human rights and conduct unbiased investigations. Such actions do not belong in a society ruled by law.
The Chen case is a major case that has agitated both the pan-blue and pan-green camps. Some media outlets issue groundless accusations and sensationalize the case, while pundits reveal inside information to influence the case. Even the special investigation team has violated the secrecy of the investigation, damaging the reputation of the suspect. The need for so many detention orders is also questionable.
We still remember how many corrupt government officials in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and business tycoons escaped prosecution. Some, such as Rebar Group founder Wang You-theng (王又曾) and former Pingtung County commissioner Wu Tse-yuan (伍澤元) remain at large. And despite the similarities between Chen’s state affairs fund and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) special mayoral allowance fund, the two men have received very different treatment. Nor were the thousands of high-ranking officials with access to special allowance funds prosecuted. Where is the justice in this?
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Tainan City Councilor Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) was indicted with demands for a 14-month jail sentence for allegedly mobbing Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Vice Chairman Zhang Mingqing (張銘清) just six days after the incident, while DPP Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) was detained even before a summons was issued.
This atmosphere has caused the green camp to ask whether this is judicial investigation or politically motivated persecution.
Taiwan is a country ruled by law. We must insist on the law as the last line of defense for social justice. Hopefully, prosecutors will investigate Chen’s case conscientiously. They should offer a solid indictment in response to doubts of the accused and the public. Judges should be impartial to ensure a fair trial.
If corrupt officials are brought to justice, democracy and the rule of law will take a giant leap forward. If the law is applied unfairly, public trust in the law will dissipate and the Taiwanese public will pay the price.
Lee Wen-chung is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US