We thought thE authoritarian regime was long gone.
We thought that freedom of speech had become part of our life.We were wrong.
Freedom and democracy — hard to attain, easy to crush. Over the past half a century, many have sacrificed their freedom, their youth, even their dear lives to attain these rights. However, in this past week, we have witnessed the return of the authoritarian regime, with its relentless suppression of freedom of speech and assembly. In order to “welcome” Chen Yun-lin (陳雲林), the special envoy from China, peaceful protesters who were waving national flags or banners, singing or loudly voicing their appeals were brutally “served” by the police with fists, kicks and sticks.
Society was shocked by this regression of democracy and freedom of speech. Civic groups have begun to organize themselves. University students have taken action to defend their freedom of speech.
The sit-in protest by students started in front of the Executive Yuan on Thursday night last week. Three days later, the students formed the “Wild Strawberries Movement.” Democracy is in peril, they say, and critical issues are at stake: The Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) violates the Constitution and human rights have been infringed upon. They have demanded that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Liu Chao-hsuan (劉兆玄) apologize; that National Security Bureau Director Tsai Chao-ming (蔡朝明) and National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞) step down and that the Assembly and Parade Law be amended.
In support of the students’ cause, civic groups on Tuesday launched a vigil walk around Liberty Square from 6pm to 7pm every evening. The organizers are calling on people from all walks of life to participate in this civic movement to support the “Wild Strawberries” and “safeguard Taiwan.”
As democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) said: “Our strength has its roots in our solidarity.” To preserve our hard-won achievements in democracy, we must demonstrate the will and strength of civil society, condemn the use of state violence and defend the freedom of speech.
Jason Liu is a professor at the National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS