ARATS’ shady connections
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is ready to talk about corruption and violence with the opposition party. The latest events show that this is not such a bad idea, with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Tainan City Councilor Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) the victim of an assault by pro-China gangsters.
Huang Ju-yi (黃如意), a suspected gangster, threatened Wang and admitted that Zhang Mingqing (張銘清), vice chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS), was his friend.
In a few days Taiwanese leaders will meet ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林). Huang’s statement shows that Chen’s subordinate, Zhang, has close relations to gangsters.
So maybe it is not such a bad idea to talk about corruption and violence. Before Ma shakes hands with Chen, he should tell Taiwanese how concerned he is about the connections between gangsters and Chinese politicians and the violence and threats by pro-Chinese gangsters against a Taiwanese politician.
Before Ma strikes any deal with Chinese officials, he should let them know how ardent a fighter against corruption and violence he is and that he can’t be on the side of those who may be gangsters’ friends.
Hanna Shen
Taipei
In stores near you
In your insightful editorial on Tuesday (“Mao’s odd (and worrying) comeback,” Oct. 28, page 8), it was mentioned that images of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) are now appearing here and there around China, from Chongqing Medical University’s 20m high statue of Mao to large portraits of him at various Beijing sites during the Olympics. It is indeed an odd comeback for such a man.
I wonder if your editorial writer is aware that local 7-Eleven stores in Taiwan are now selling cute figurine dolls of Mao made by an outfit called Dong Jui International. Who in Taiwan would buy such dolls and why?
I didn’t see any dolls of Adolf Hitler on the counter.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS