A year or two ago, if you’d told me that Democratic Senator Barack Obama would be leading Republican Senator John McCain by a seemingly comfortable margin with two weeks to go and asked me what, in their desperation, the Republicans would be talking about to try and scare my fellow US citizens into voting against him, I’d have said race.
After all, Republicans have race-baited in one form or other in most of our presidential contests since former US president Richard Nixon’s time, so it would have seemed impossible to me that they’d miss the chance to do so at a time when Democrats had actually gone to the trouble of nominating an African-American candidate.
It’s true that we’re hearing racial-code talk here and there. But the main fear tactic being employed now is something else. It’s that Obama and his associates — and for that matter his supporters and even the regions of the country that he’s destined to carry — are anti-American.
On Oct. 17 at a rally in North Carolina, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin told her audience that she was proud to be “with all of you hard-working, very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation.” She means here of course that there are anti-American areas of the US, and they are where the liberals live, and the people there are voting for Mr Anti-America.
This was especially interesting coming from a woman whose husband, Todd Palin, was until just six years ago an enrolled member of a rightwing fringe political party that wanted the state of Alaska to secede from the US. But if you understand rightwing logic, then you’d know that Todd had no choice but to join the Alaska Independence party in 1995, because by that time the US he thought he knew and loved had been brought to ruin by the liberals and socialists and America-haters. See?
Likewise, earlier this month, Joe McCain, the brother of John, said that Alexandria and Arlington, the two major cities in the northern Virginia suburbs that lie just across the Potomac River from Washington, were “communist country” as far as he was concerned. His brother lives in Arlington when in the nation’s capital for work, and his brother’s campaign is headquartered there as well, but never mind.
‘THE REAL VIRGINIA’
A McCain spokeswoman offered a wan apology at the time, but lo and behold, just last Saturday a different McCain spokeswoman said on television that while Obama would perform well in northern Virginia, “the rest of the state — real Virginia if you will — I think will be very responsive to Senator McCain’s message.” This did not seem to be a planned one-liner. The spokeswoman made the fatal error of saying what she actually thinks. Republican Virginia equals real Virginia. Democratic Virginia is alien and impure.
This point was proven most dramatically by a woman named Representative Michele Bachmann, a member of Congress from Minnesota. In an interview on Oct. 17 on Hardball, a leading US cable talk show, host Chris Matthews asked Bachmann whether Obama worried her.
“Absolutely. I’m very concerned that he may have anti-American views,” she said.
He asked her what she thought distinguished liberal from hard left from anti-American. If she maintains such distinctions in her mind, she refused to acknowledge them. Then, finally, Matthews — who deftly fed her the rope to hang herself — asked her how many members of the US Congress held, in her view, anti-American views.
It’s been almost a two-year campaign. There have been moments we’ve thought of as memorable at the time, only to see the high tide of new events erase their mark from the sand. Bachmann’s answer, however, will live imperishably.
PRO OR ANTI-AMERICAN
“What I would say — what I would say is that the news media should do a penetrating expose and take a look. I wish they would. I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out, are they pro-America or anti-America? I think people would love to see an expose like that,” she said.
Before we go any further — who is this Bachmann? She’s a first-term backbencher from exurban Minneapolis who says the Lord told her to run for Congress. She declared herself “a fool for Christ” in 2006 when she announced her candidacy. By all accounts she’s down with the whole rightwing Christian package: Immigrants bring disease and pestilence, homosexuals want to indoctrinate straight children and so on. Republican leadership undoubtedly pushed her out on to television because she is, as some say, a looker — at least by the standards of Congress.
The call for an investigation into the beliefs of every federal lawmaker and an expose of those found wanting in their patriotism certainly takes us into deeply creepy territory. I would not call Bachmann herself a fascist. Odd as it sounds, to do so would be to grant her far too much credit. For one to embrace an -ism, even a repugnant one, one needs to have read a certain amount of history and political philosophy.
Bachmann is just an idiot. She wouldn’t know Edmund Burke from Billie Burke — she played the good witch in the Wizard of Oz — and she obviously has no idea that, in her rejection of the two bedrock American principles of separation of church and state and freedom of thought, she is the one who is as anti-American as they come.
But friends, all is not darkness. Bachmann’s appearance caused a national uproar. Her Democratic opponent raised nearly US$500,000 from around the country in just 24 hours, and he now has a chance of beating her.
That would be nice. But let’s go back to the big contest. With Bachmann, the lid came off the rightwing id. It will happen many more times over these next week. McCain, who now openly uses the word “socialist” to describe Obama’s proposals — the week after his friend US President George W. Bush took federal control of nine major banks — and especially Palin have shown every sign of encouraging it. Their goal is to scare the US citizens about Obama, but moderate, independent voters might well decide that Obama looks a lot less scary than they do.
Michael Tomasky is editor of Guardian America.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the