It’s time to go home
As the saying goes: “Democracy is the art of disciplining oneself so that one need not be disciplined by others.” Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Vice Chairman Zhang Mingqing’s (張銘清) statement that there will be no war if Taiwan doesn’t proclaim independence is a good illustration that Chinese officials need a long time to learn the art.
China is still an authoritarian regime controlling people with fear. There is no freedom of speech or religion where Zhang comes from. Human rights abuse and corruption are widespread.
And Zhang feels entitled to discipline and chastise Taiwanese, forgetting that on this free island it is the right of the people to decide whether they want to be independent or not. They have a choice that Zhang’s fellow countrymen are not given.
We all know China is a nation of great ambition, but to really get a “place in the sun,” it has to build a modern society. And the truly modern are those with integrity, those whose integrity is supported by a network of political and civil rights, those who can vote and argue freely.
It is high time for Zhang to go home and discipline the fellow members of his political clique.
Hanna Shen
Taipei
‘Don’t destroy’
Freddy Lim (林昶佐), who campaigned in many countries for Taiwan to join the UN, is urging people to join the Oct. 25 demonstration against Chinese poisoned foods and in support of Taiwan’s sovereignty, initiated by the Democratic Progressive Party, the Taiwan Solidarity Union and several pro-Taiwan organizations.
The slogan Freddy will use is mtang huilui (勿通匪類) which means “don’t destroy” (or “don’t degenerate”) in Hoklo. This slogan asks the Ma administration not to ruin Taiwan’s future — its health, education, economy, democracy and sovereignty in particular.
The same slogan has a completely different meaning in Mandarin. It literally means “Don’t communicate with bandits.” In the anti-communist eras of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Chinese communists were called the “communist bandits” or simply “bandits.” At that time, there was one rule: If you know a bandit and don’t report him or her to the government, you are as guilty as the bandit. The “bandits” were mostly executed in the Machangding (馬場町) area of Taipei.
Today, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — in spite of his worship for both Chiangs — runs a pro-communist government and puts Taiwan in jeopardy. Freddy’s slogan may have different meanings in Taiwanese and Mandarin but serves the same purpose. It asks the government to not get too close to China, otherwise Taiwan will be destroyed.
Hopefully, Ma will listen to the demonstrators’ appeal and take the necessary actions to rectify his unpopular policies toward China. People have had enough of Ma’s “thank you for your suggestions” and then forgetting the suggestions.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS