On Friday, Beijing answered a question foreign correspondents in China have no doubt eagerly awaited: Would it scrap loosened rules for foreign media now that the Olympics have passed? The answer was no. The Chinese Communist Party extended the rules that it introduced more than a year ago.
Back then, Beijing was compelled by promises made to the International Olympic Committee to give media free rein during the Games. Today, its insincerity is equally apparent: The laxer regulations will not apply to China’s own press corps.
China has complained that foreign reporters do not understand the country well enough and produce biased reports on developments there. Yet it remains a mystery why Beijing will not afford these same, basic freedoms to domestic media, who understand China and have undergone decades of political indoctrination in an environment replete with propaganda. If Beijing can’t trust these people to produce reports to its taste, it might do well to ask itself why.
Censoring its own journalists has at times had dire consequences, yet Beijing refuses to loosen its grip. The state-imposed silence as an outbreak of enterovirus spread in March brought to mind the SARS debacle. Likewise, Reporters without Borders has accused Beijing of stifling early reports of the melamine scandal, when parents should have been informed post haste about the danger posed to their children’s health.
China also kept a tight grip on reporting about the corruption trial of former Beijing vice mayor Liu Zhihua (劉志華), who played a key role in preparations for the Olympics and has just been sentenced to death.
Among the rule changes that apply to foreign correspondents are free movement within China and freedom to interview any citizen. This looks great on paper, but as observed over the last year and a half, the new regulations may have simply been a publicity stunt.
Complaints gathered by the Foreign Correspondents Club in Beijing indicate there have been at least 336 violations so far of the increased rights promised to reporters from abroad. In particular, the physical abuse of several foreign reporters during the Beijing Olympics shocked the international community.
Beijing also came out with extra restrictions on who foreign journalists could hire as assistants, guides and translators — designed to make it easier for authorities to keep an eye on those who help reporters and thus the reporters themselves.
Reports have emerged of those who speak to foreign journalists being harassed or assaulted afterwards.
China has shown scant concern for these violations and other problems, meaning there is little reason to believe any of this will change.
Recently a CNN correspondent met furtively with a lawyer counseling parents who hope to sue milk companies responsible for their children’s medical bills. Good reporting may remain a matter of getting to the source of information before authorities know who you intend to interview.
China can afford to extend the measures for foreign journalists because empty gestures are cheap. Meanwhile, the only people who stand to gain from the muzzle on local reporters are businesses and officials uninterested in shouldering responsibility for their actions and scared of swelling public discontent.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations