On Friday, Beijing answered a question foreign correspondents in China have no doubt eagerly awaited: Would it scrap loosened rules for foreign media now that the Olympics have passed? The answer was no. The Chinese Communist Party extended the rules that it introduced more than a year ago.
Back then, Beijing was compelled by promises made to the International Olympic Committee to give media free rein during the Games. Today, its insincerity is equally apparent: The laxer regulations will not apply to China’s own press corps.
China has complained that foreign reporters do not understand the country well enough and produce biased reports on developments there. Yet it remains a mystery why Beijing will not afford these same, basic freedoms to domestic media, who understand China and have undergone decades of political indoctrination in an environment replete with propaganda. If Beijing can’t trust these people to produce reports to its taste, it might do well to ask itself why.
Censoring its own journalists has at times had dire consequences, yet Beijing refuses to loosen its grip. The state-imposed silence as an outbreak of enterovirus spread in March brought to mind the SARS debacle. Likewise, Reporters without Borders has accused Beijing of stifling early reports of the melamine scandal, when parents should have been informed post haste about the danger posed to their children’s health.
China also kept a tight grip on reporting about the corruption trial of former Beijing vice mayor Liu Zhihua (劉志華), who played a key role in preparations for the Olympics and has just been sentenced to death.
Among the rule changes that apply to foreign correspondents are free movement within China and freedom to interview any citizen. This looks great on paper, but as observed over the last year and a half, the new regulations may have simply been a publicity stunt.
Complaints gathered by the Foreign Correspondents Club in Beijing indicate there have been at least 336 violations so far of the increased rights promised to reporters from abroad. In particular, the physical abuse of several foreign reporters during the Beijing Olympics shocked the international community.
Beijing also came out with extra restrictions on who foreign journalists could hire as assistants, guides and translators — designed to make it easier for authorities to keep an eye on those who help reporters and thus the reporters themselves.
Reports have emerged of those who speak to foreign journalists being harassed or assaulted afterwards.
China has shown scant concern for these violations and other problems, meaning there is little reason to believe any of this will change.
Recently a CNN correspondent met furtively with a lawyer counseling parents who hope to sue milk companies responsible for their children’s medical bills. Good reporting may remain a matter of getting to the source of information before authorities know who you intend to interview.
China can afford to extend the measures for foreign journalists because empty gestures are cheap. Meanwhile, the only people who stand to gain from the muzzle on local reporters are businesses and officials uninterested in shouldering responsibility for their actions and scared of swelling public discontent.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS