Regardless of whether the massive US bailout of Wall Street with huge capital injections into the banking system will work or not, the world has seen the end of laissez-faire, free-market economies. If the US financial and monetary systems are not salvaged or partially rebuilt, the US may lose its credibility and status as a financial superpower.
In comparison, the Chinese economy was growing at an annual rate of 9 percent before the financial crisis, generating astronomical foreign reserves. China currently holds about US$1 trillion in US debt, including US$460 billion in US Treasury bills. Before the US Congress passed the bailout package, there were reports that the Chinese threatened to reconsider their policy of buying US debts unless Washington moved to stabilize the markets.
With so much at stake, Beijing appears unlikely to stop buying Treasury securities or start selling their US holdings because such actions would not only throw the world market into deeper chaos but would also reduce the value of Chinese holdings in the US.
China is not without its own looming financial problems. In the globalize world, a deep US downturn will hit China, whose growing economic clout has been largely dependent on its exports to the US. A US recession accompanied by the shrinkage of the insatiable appetite of US consumers will most definitely induce a significant reduction in China ’s GDP. But a Chinese slump will also lower commodity prices.
While US citizens have been horrendous spenders, by comparison, Chinese have been meritorious savers. In the past 10 years, US savings declined from 5 percent to virtually zero, while Chinese savings surged from less than 30 percent to nearly 45 percent. To add fuel to the fire, traditional forms of savings in the US were abandoned in favor of leveraged speculation in both stock and real estate markets. Such activities brought about a tremendous explosion of debt in the US.
A quick glance at history tells us that the British pound used to be the world’s No. 1 currency, in which most financial transactions were made. Sterling nevertheless slid from close to US$5 before World War II to near par in 1980s. The reasons were the huge deficits incurred from fighting two world wars and the UK’s underperforming economy, which lasted for decades.
Is the US heading down a similar path with its geopolitical and financial hegemony being edged out by China?
In a 2005 Goldman Sachs report, China was projected to overtake the US in GDP by 2040. Before this wave of financial turmoil, the date had been brought forward to 2027. Now, some analysts say the date may come even sooner.
Despite all of these factors, we should not simply write off the US and prophesy that the 21st century will belong to the Chinese. In the last two weeks, the US stock market plummeted 22 percent but its Chinese counterpart suffered an even more appalling 55 percent freefall.
If Washington is able to avert a fresh wave of banking failures and credit meltdown, the world will likely see the US emerge with its geopolitical eminence significantly enhanced, much like after the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Great Stagflation of the 1970s.
As the world still considers US government debts as “safe haven” in uncertain times, we’ve seen the dollar rally rather than sag further, even before the US$700 billion bailout package was passed by the US Congress. Fund injections from around the world will provide sufficient ammunition to help the US recover.
What do all these events mean to Taiwanese?
Geopolitically speaking, the US will find it harder to denounce China for human rights abuses while simultaneously expecting Beijing to keep buying US Treasury bills. If China’s ownership of US debt exceeds a certain threshold, Beijing may even hold veto power over US support for Taiwan, especially in a military contingency across the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan lacks strategic thinking and appears rather weak and passive in the face of the current financial crisis. Not surprisingly, the nation was completely excluded from the recent “ASEAN plus three” conference — potentially the world’s largest free trade zone — which discussed concerted action to tackle the global monetary tsunami.
Taiwan is lucky Beijing hasn’t attempted to acquire US banks that are on the verge of bankruptcy. If China were to acquire foundering US banks, it would not only help Beijing gain inside knowledge of the US financial system, but would also dramatically reshape the negative impression of China in the US.
Moreover, Beijing’s passive ownership of US debt, though useful at certain levels, doesn’t empower China in building badly needed domestic infrastructure, financial or otherwise.
Taiwanese have long suffered from political-economic schizophrenia because we maintain that Taiwan is a sovereign country and simultaneously conduct business and trade with China without demanding the auspices of a sovereign nation.
As we criticize the US for losing the moral high ground when it invaded Iraq, by a similar token, it is illogical for Taiwan to expect the US to support its sovereignty while Taipei leans ever closer to Beijing.
Holmes Liao is a former adviser to Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and adjunct professor at the War College, National Defense University. He currently lives in Washington and works as an aerospace professional.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US