Double Ten day fiction has arrived again and so it is appropriate to reflect on the nation’s status since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took power in May and why Taiwan continues to be an orphan in the international community.
The confusion over Taiwan’s international status has its origins in the defunct Republic of China (ROC). When the ROC came into existence in 1912, Taiwan was not included in its Constitution because it was, at the time, a colony of Japan. After the Nationalists lost China’s civil war, the island became a refuge for them and the Constitution they brought with them. In other words, the ROC government was exiled to a land that was never part of its founding Constitution.
So it’s somewhat odd that Ma told a Japanese magazine earlier this week that, under the ROC Constitution, the ROC “definitely is an independent sovereign state, and mainland [sic] China is also part of the territory of the ROC.”
What era is Ma living in, and where? Espousing a discredited nationalist ideology in public demonstrates how far back Ma seeks to turn the clock on Taiwan’s maturing identity. It also dangerously lends credence to China’s unjustifiable claims over Taiwan.
Matthew Lee (李世明), chief of the Department of Protocol at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said 171 foreign guests from diplomatic allies and other countries would attend this year’s Double Ten day celebrations, a significant reduction from 368 people last year. It is hardly surprising that so few foreign dignitaries would show up when Ma is focusing so much on China.
Justifying the large discrepancy, the ministry said that 584 guests attended Ma’s inauguration in June, effectively using up most of the Double Ten day budget. But the Double Ten day celebrations have their own budget. Moreover, the presidential election occurs once every four years, so calling Ma’s inauguration a national celebration is ridiculous. The real issue seems to be that Ma is trying to appease Beijing by keeping national day celebrations low-key.
It is ironic that this year’s festivities will be held without a military parade just after the White House approved an arms package for Taiwan. This contrasts with last year’s celebrations, which featured a military parade at a time when the government and opposition parties failed to reach agreement over the arms deal. But suggestions earlier this week by National Security Bureau Director Tsai Chao-ming (蔡朝明) that the 2003 SARS outbreak might be a biological weapon spawned by China makes a weapons package seem less relevant.
The current administration’s actions since it gained power — placing all its diplomatic and economic eggs in China’s basket while insisting that Taiwan is a “region” rather than a nation — betrays a government that has an interest in the fiction of a greater Chinese nationalism.
As recently as 2006, Academia Sinica researcher Wu Nai-teh (吳乃德) showed a steady increase from 1991 to 2004 in the number of people identifying themselves as Taiwanese. He also showed that those identifying themselves as Chinese fell proportionately.
In five months, Ma has brought the country back 10 years in terms of Taiwanese identity and a century in terms of creating a nation. Consequently, any meaningful participation internationally will have to wait at least another four years.
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
With the Taipei mayoral election quickly heating up, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) campaign team has finally started to get serious this month, but a major mudslinging initiative and several sloppy mistakes have drawn a larger wave of public criticism, while sporadic municipal issues continue to crop up, raising concerns about whether the city government’s wheels are coming off. Just a few months ago, Chiang of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was widely expected to win handily in Taipei, traditionally a political stronghold for the KMT and with no major third-party candidates this year. KMT supporters regarded him as a frontrunner