The damage caused by Typhoon Sinlaku and the way it was handled has once again made Taiwan look like a backward nation. The TV images of people who lost family members because of the typhoon have been very upsetting. Although typhoons are scary, what is even scarier is the way the public has lost sight of the reason why the storm wreaked so much havoc, and why the government has been unable to prevent these problems.
Taiwan may have experienced an economic miracle, but we have also seen tragedies brought on by natural disasters. Having just passed the ninth anniversary of the 921 Earthquake in 1999; we are still destroying the land that we live and rely on. Conserving energy and reducing carbon emissions are a main focus of the government.
By the time these policies reach the various ministries, however, they have become fragmented, disconnected technical ideas devoid of a comprehensive vision or complementary measures. At a time when an emphasis is being placed on reviving the economy and increasing domestic demand, more damage will be done to our environment as a result of unfettered construction.
Increased investment means private companies are developing more environmentally sensitive areas. Whether it be the mudslide that crushed the Fengchiu Tunnel or the collapsed hotels that had been built on riverbeds at the Lushan Hot Springs Area in Nantou County, these incidents should encourage the public to take a closer look at the real reasons for these environment-linked tragedies and methods to prevent their reoccurrence.
The key to the issue lies in how we look at fundamental solutions, such as land preservation legislation and attempts at eliminating problems at the source.
The Fengchiu Tunnel is a prime example — after the New Central Cross-Island Highway was completed, the lack of complementary measures and land-use controls meant that environmentally sensitive areas of the region became overdeveloped. Given the softer soil caused by earthquakes in this area, this section of road was under threat from landslides.
Reconstruction should have focused on a fundamental solution to the factors causing the problems. However, road construction authorities are restricted by law to doing temporary work on the slopes immediately adjacent to landslides and falling rocks.
The blinkered vision of senior authorities prevents them from taking a comprehensive approach to dealing with the fundamental issue: mountainside development.
The deaths caused by the massive landslide at the Fengchiu Tunnel resulted from the tunnel being built to provide temporary shelter from rock slides and landslides because it wasn’t possible to solve the real reasons for the landslides.
The recent typhoon disaster increased the danger level of 40 dangerous river bridges. The support pilings of the Wuxi Bridge in Taichung County, which was built in 2001, have already been exposed. The problem with these bridges isn’t the way they were built. It is that the 921 Earthquake and illegal gravel mining have changed the course of some rivers. This is a problem that can only be solved through interministerial coordination.
Another case of inappropriate development arises from national land planning and complementary local development measures. A prime example of questionable development is the dozens of hotels that have been built alongside riverbeds, often blocking large parts of the river. Flooding triggered by the recent typhoon led to the collapse of several buildings illegally erected in rivers, revealing developers’ greed and an almost total disregard for the government.
Taiwan’s plan for the next 100 years should focus on sustainable development. Using a comprehensive approach, the government should look at the environmental protection issues important to each city and county and the strong points of each of these places. It should then manage demand, rather than allowing unbridled development aimed at “increasing domestic demand.” This is the only way to solve the current crisis.
Teamwork and controls at different levels of government is the only way to set up a framework for comprehensive environmental protection. Without such a framework, the development of partial emergency measures and piecemeal technological developments will do nothing to protect the environment or human life.
Next year will be the 10th anniversary of the 921 Earthquake. Perhaps Taiwan will choose collective amnesia and continue with unbridled development. But every disaster is a reminder of Mother Nature’s power.
Environmental protection has become trendy in recent years and the National Land Restoration Act (國土復育條例) was established at a critical juncture. The act is now instrumental in protecting the environment. The draft national land planning act is also aimed at helping create a balanced ecology. However, the government’s fixation on saving energy and reducing carbon emissions has made ministries forget that sustainable development is the goal. There are many environmental protection policies and mechanisms in place and these should continue to be promoted, regardless of which political party is in power.
Development and environmental protection need not be in direct opposition. Given Taiwan’s topography and geology, however, development needs to be regulated in order to ensure sustainable development and protect lives.
As people question who is responsible for improving our environmental situation, perhaps environmental ideas that have long been politicized will again win favor. Environmental legislation should be completed at the appropriate time and everyone in Taiwan should try to do something for the sustainable development of the country.
Hochen Tan is chairman of the Taiwan Ecological Engineering Development Foundation.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
RSS