After a lackluster presidential campaign that wasted far too much breath on non-issues like the status of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) green card, serious damage was done to the reputation of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Add to this the eruption of money-laundering allegations against the party’s single most influential figure, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who withdrew from the DPP last month, and things look even bleaker than after the party’s humiliation at January’s legislative polls.
Key to the party’s recovery will be the strength of new voices, which must present the face of a maturing DPP. That will require not only demonstrating a commitment to discussing reform, but showcasing concrete changes.
Unfortunately, the DPP has little to show for all its talk on overcoming its weaknesses. With nominations for the next round of local government elections already being discussed, the DPP must shift into action or it will have a tough case to make for its candidates next year.
But there is plenty of fodder for successful campaigning.
Investors and economic analysts are largely unimpressed with the Ma administration’s handling of the economy, while the public has seen no indication that Ma’s policies on China will have a positive impact on their living standards.
In addition, allegations of corruption and misuse of funds have called into question the actions of local chiefs such as Taitung County Commissioner Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) and Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Kuang sparked an outcry by continuing with an overseas trip as a typhoon approached her county — criticism that stirred up its own storm as questions grew about her use of taxpayers’ money. Chou, meanwhile, is busy fending off allegations that his office accepted bribes from a parking lot company.
If the DPP hopes to offer strong alternatives in the next legislative and presidential polls, it must begin in next year’s local elections by offering real alternatives to the same shady politics that has long frustrated the public.
For this reason, it was disappointing to hear on Monday that DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will likely not run against Chou for the Taipei County commissionership. The increasingly popular chairwoman has repeatedly expressed her intentions to shake up the party and has dealt well with the scandal surrounding Chen, but the public is still waiting to see her take a more aggressive role in reshaping her party. Tsai must indicate that she is more than the new face of DPP public relations.
Taipei County, meanwhile, deserves a county commissioner with its best interests in mind — one who does not blur the lines of legality and illegality, as Chou has expressed a willingness to do to see through the construction of the Tanbei Expressway.
The elections for county commissioner may seem far on the horizon, but for the DPP there is no time for licking wounds. If the party has learned anything from adversity, now is the time to start making its case. Ma’s administration has certainly offered enough bungling for it to capitalize on.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS