When looking at President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) main policies, it is quite easy to feel that he has a multiple-personality disorder. Ma calls for a diplomatic truce and the improvement of cross-strait relations on the one hand, and on the other he talks about ending war but not fearing war, and preparing for war but not asking for it, as if Taiwan would not step back from a war with China.
During a visit to Taiwan’s outlying islands a few days ago, Ma said the improvements in cross-strait relations his policies have brought about should not affect the military’s preparedness for war because Taiwan needs that strength as a backup. He said Taiwan cannot relax its efforts to build its army and prepare for war, as this is the only way the government can defend the public’s interests and national dignity and sovereignty when engaging in discussions with China. He also said basic military procurement must continue and that Taiwan should acquire the weapons it needs.
In a speech on Armed Forces Day, Ma said the government’s efforts to improve cross-strait relations already have brought hope for peace. He said that we must not forget that China has more than 1,000 missiles aimed at Taiwan.
Ma has made it sound as if he has no plans to rest in terms of national defense, despite his diplomatic truce and the attempt to improve cross-strait relations. He has called for strengthening the military and preparing for war, but has also placed cross-strait relations ahead of diplomatic policies, recognized the so-called “1992 consensus” and announced that the relationship that exists between Taiwan and China is not a state-to-state relationship. This is tantamount to saying that Taiwan is part of China or, in other words, the “Taiwan Area of China.”
These moves must have confused the armed forces and they must feel like they have no idea what they are fighting for or who they are supposed to be protecting.
The Constitution says the military must be loyal and serve the nation. However, it is questionable if the armed forces even know which “country” Ma is talking about when he refers to “our country.” Could he mean the “enemy” country on the other side of the Taiwan Strait?
Remember how the Ministry of National Defense changed the words in the Youth Daily News from “Fight for the survival and development of Taiwan” to “Fight for the survival and development of the Republic of China” after Ma was elected?
In fact, although Ma emphasized that the Republic of China (ROC) is a sovereign nation during his campaign, since taking office he has worked hard at dismantling that sovereignty and diminishing Taiwan’s status into that of a “Taiwan Area” within the “one China” framework. He is even willing to be referred to as “Mr Ma” when dealing with Chinese officials. Now that the ROC’s president is content at being referred to as “Mr Ma from the Taiwan Area of China,” isn’t it time that our armed forces, which are supposed to “fight for the survival and development of the Republic of China,” stepped forward and declare war on Ma?
A little bit of Taiwan’s national sovereignty slips through Ma’s fingers every day. He has said “Chinese Taipei” is the most suitable name to use when applying for UN membership and talked about how “Taiwan and China belong to the same China.” He has also said that relations between China and Taiwan are “special,” but are not state-to-state relations.
Ma’s promise to “protect the nation” when he was sworn in as president has turned out to be as hollow and as much of a joke as his “6-3-3” economic policy and his big talk about how the stock market would hit 20,000 points if he was elected.
National sovereignty, regardless of whether we call the nation Taiwan or the ROC, is now merely a sacrificial object that Ma uses in his dealings with China.
Ma’s dismantling of Taiwan’s sovereignty has been strongly opposed by those who hold that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation. However, those who are in favor of protecting the ROC should also unite to oust Ma.
People such as former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰), People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) have spoken about protecting the ROC while on Taiwanese soil but lacked the guts to defend Taiwan when visiting China. At least those incidents happened in China.
Ma, however, shamelessly denigrates his nation on Taiwanese soil and even to the foreign guests he meets at the Presidential Office. What an irony to hear Ma shout slogans like “Long live the ROC” on Taiwan’s National Day.
With Ma failing to deliver on his “6-3-3” promise, the economy has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Ma should take responsibility for this.
More important than the economy, though, are the moves he is making to rob Taiwan of its sovereignty.
Faced with such a crisis, everyone — regardless of whether they support “Taiwan” or the “ROC” — should step forward and stop Ma from conspiring with Beijing to make this country a part of China. If we give up national power, we can stop discussing the broken “6-3-3” promise, since one day we may wake up without even the most basic democracy, freedom or human rights.
Translated by Drew Cameron
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
RSS