After a lot of complaints, the Cabinet has finally proposed a plan to revive the economy. The first measure, reducing the securities transaction tax by 50 percent for half a year, did nothing to improve the situation — the stock market reacted by dropping another 206.06 points, or 3.19 percent, yesterday.
The question of whether the economy should be resuscitated through tax cuts or a tax refund has been a matter of heated debate. The opposition wants to follow the international trend and supports a tax refund, while industrial and trade organizations have advocated big cuts in business income, estate and gift taxes. The Ministry of Economic Affairs wanted to restore the five year tax exemption for traditional industry, while some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators called for the cut in the securities transaction tax.
The question is whether these tax cuts and refund proposals will produce results in the short run but have long-term negative consequences.
The focus of the Cabinet’s tax reform committee is on low taxes and a streamlined government, and it will begin with reforming income, consumption, property and energy taxes, but this will not have an impact on current economic problems.
If the securities transaction, estate and gift taxes were reduced to resuscitate the economy in the short term but had a detrimental effect on tax reform in general, then the committee would render itself superfluous.
The Cabinet followed the wishes of KMT legislators and lowered the securities transaction tax, hoping it would strengthen confidence and kick start the stock market. If, however, the measure is not supported by international developments and domestic fundamentals, it will not be effective.
Selective measures aimed at quick fixes — which might be difficult to rescind in six months’ time — are certain to have a big impact on tax revenue. It is also unfair to only benefit stock market investors rather than offer rebates to the general public.
The US is dealing with its subprime crisis through tax refunds, and Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan and even China are following its example.
The US approach has already produced some results: The economic growth rate increased from 0.9 percent in the first quarter to 3.3 percent in the second. This implies that tax refunds are an effective way to deal with a slowing economy.
However, Taiwan’s government rejected a tax refund because it must first have money to refund. Government finances have been in the red recently, so funds are short and must be found elsewhere. In addition, 27 percent of those filing taxes are exempt from paying individual income tax, while 46 percent of those who pay income tax are in the lowest tax bracket, at 6 percent. These people will either not be entitled to a tax refund, or the refund will be extremely small. It will do nothing to resuscitate the economy.
The government has issued debt to expand domestic demand. If it expands the tax refund to include the general public based on a percentage of overall tax revenue rather than restricting it to individual income tax or selective tax cuts, the tax system would not be distorted.
A progressive tax refund would benefit everyone — the lower the income, the higher the refund — by boosting consumption. In addition, this would help correct uneven income distribution.
If the government feels uncomfortable with a comprehensive tax refund, Vice President Vincent Siew’s (蕭萬長) suggestion of a so-called “468” negative income tax, while not as effective as a refund, would help low income households as well as the economy. But the government must act fast.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China