After a lot of complaints, the Cabinet has finally proposed a plan to revive the economy. The first measure, reducing the securities transaction tax by 50 percent for half a year, did nothing to improve the situation — the stock market reacted by dropping another 206.06 points, or 3.19 percent, yesterday.
The question of whether the economy should be resuscitated through tax cuts or a tax refund has been a matter of heated debate. The opposition wants to follow the international trend and supports a tax refund, while industrial and trade organizations have advocated big cuts in business income, estate and gift taxes. The Ministry of Economic Affairs wanted to restore the five year tax exemption for traditional industry, while some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators called for the cut in the securities transaction tax.
The question is whether these tax cuts and refund proposals will produce results in the short run but have long-term negative consequences.
The focus of the Cabinet’s tax reform committee is on low taxes and a streamlined government, and it will begin with reforming income, consumption, property and energy taxes, but this will not have an impact on current economic problems.
If the securities transaction, estate and gift taxes were reduced to resuscitate the economy in the short term but had a detrimental effect on tax reform in general, then the committee would render itself superfluous.
The Cabinet followed the wishes of KMT legislators and lowered the securities transaction tax, hoping it would strengthen confidence and kick start the stock market. If, however, the measure is not supported by international developments and domestic fundamentals, it will not be effective.
Selective measures aimed at quick fixes — which might be difficult to rescind in six months’ time — are certain to have a big impact on tax revenue. It is also unfair to only benefit stock market investors rather than offer rebates to the general public.
The US is dealing with its subprime crisis through tax refunds, and Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan and even China are following its example.
The US approach has already produced some results: The economic growth rate increased from 0.9 percent in the first quarter to 3.3 percent in the second. This implies that tax refunds are an effective way to deal with a slowing economy.
However, Taiwan’s government rejected a tax refund because it must first have money to refund. Government finances have been in the red recently, so funds are short and must be found elsewhere. In addition, 27 percent of those filing taxes are exempt from paying individual income tax, while 46 percent of those who pay income tax are in the lowest tax bracket, at 6 percent. These people will either not be entitled to a tax refund, or the refund will be extremely small. It will do nothing to resuscitate the economy.
The government has issued debt to expand domestic demand. If it expands the tax refund to include the general public based on a percentage of overall tax revenue rather than restricting it to individual income tax or selective tax cuts, the tax system would not be distorted.
A progressive tax refund would benefit everyone — the lower the income, the higher the refund — by boosting consumption. In addition, this would help correct uneven income distribution.
If the government feels uncomfortable with a comprehensive tax refund, Vice President Vincent Siew’s (蕭萬長) suggestion of a so-called “468” negative income tax, while not as effective as a refund, would help low income households as well as the economy. But the government must act fast.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.