Throughout his political career, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has been able to effortlessly sweep away his enemies and gain quick promotions. After 100 days as president, however, Ma the media darling unexpectedly fell from grace, and his arrogance was replaced by embarrassment. There are more reasons for his dramatic rise and fall than simply public criticism.
As soon as the confident Ma took the helm, he announced a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing, laying diplomatic relations — which require active long-term management — to rest. Promoting diplomacy is like moving against the current; if one doesn’t move forward, one slips back. The cancellation of several proposed plans to connect Taiwan internationally, such as the pro-Taiwan African association and the Austronesian Forum, demonstrate how Taiwan’s diplomacy is being undermined. Ma’s diplomatic truce is clearly becoming another isolationist policy.
In terms of national security, Taiwan has also adopted a passive attitude. It is halting development of the Hsiungfeng 2-E missiles designed to counter China’s missile threat, and is planning to spend tens of billions of NT dollars on a bridge connecting Kinmen and China’s Xiamen, thus opening the nation wide to Beijing and abandoning national security.
Ma has also belittled Taiwan’s position in the cross-strait relationship, replacing former presidents Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “special state-to-state” theory of cross-strait relations and Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “one country on each side” formulas with his “Chinese Taipei” formula. The international response has been to interpret this as meaning “Taipei, China” and other countries are now viewing Taiwan as part of China, all but stripping Taiwan of national dignity.
Ma plans to spend NT$114.4 billion (US$3.6 billion) on boosting domestic demand. But the rashly passed budget is bloated and wasteful and does not improve social justice and care for disadvantaged groups.
Taiwan’s stock market is bleeding and the real estate market has come to a standstill. Companies are closing, and empty business premises are for rent everywhere. The export monitoring indicator even flashed blue in July for the first time since the SARS outbreak in 2003.
Both international and domestic news is negative. No wonder public confidence in Ma is plummeting. Still, Ma shamelessly calls on the public to follow him faithfully, and if they follow him until 2016, they will see his failed “6-3-3” promise realized.
Perhaps Ma’s plan is to highlight all the bad news as soon as he can, because he still has three-plus years to climb out of the hole. Adding the forgetfulness of Taiwanese voters, credibility becomes less important. Even a “living conscienceless commodity” like Ma can cloud voters’ memory with another round of campaign propaganda, and preposterous slogans such as “Let’s cast our ballots carefully this time” and “Even Martians will vote for him as long as he can fix the economy.” After all, wasn’t that how he covered up his eight years of mediocrity as Taipei mayor?
Still, public patience is limited. As each myth in the Ma pantheon is exposed as fake and his godlike status is exposed to the cruel realities of everyday life, beautiful metaphors or tempting promises will remain empty words unless they are backed up by concrete action.
In his book, Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership, Nixon to Clinton, which Ma’s team has held up as a model, David Gergen writes that although these former US presidents’ statements are inspiring, they had to be implemented before they were worth anything.
Maybe the members of Ma’s team should reread the book.
Steve Wang is a director of the European Union Study Association.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The