The seven members of the Cabinet’s National Communications Commission (NCC) took their posts last Friday. It is hoped that they will be able to perform their duties well and learn from the mistakes their predecessors made in the sales of the Broadcasting Corporation of China (BCC), China Television Co (CTV) and the sale of a majority stake in Eastern Multimedia Co to the Carlyle Group of the US.
There has recently been news that Carlyle plans to sell its stake in Eastern’s 13 cable television affiliates. In 2006, Carlyle paid NT$47.6 billion (US$1.55 billion) for control of Eastern. After less than two years, it is reportedly selling its shares.
How can the experts that were so confident in foreign investment in Taiwan’s cable television industry explain this? The truth is that the incentive for foreigners to invest in Taiwan’s cable television industry is not as substantial as first thought. Initial market expectations, including foreign capital, technology upgrades and acceleration of digitalization, have all failed to deliver.
A more fundamental issue that needs to be looked at is why the authorities approved Carlyle’s purchase of Eastern in the face of all the criticism the issue received. We have to ask why the NCC merely delayed the case by requesting supplementary documents, eventually pinning the responsibility on the Investment Commission at the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Why did it approve the case so easily without taking responsibility or demanding that Carlyle be a responsible operator?
For example, Carlyle failed to downsize its staff or sell its shares within its first year of operation. It also did not increase the coverage of digitalized fiber networks of its cable television systems to 80 percent, nor did it allocate certain channels for public welfare use, non-commercial use or to minority or disadvantaged groups.
This is not the first time these problems have occurred. The NCC’s former commissioners failed to demand greater responsibility from those in charge when it approved similar cases in the past. Examples of this include the sale of CTV to China Times Group chairman Albert Yu (余建新), the sale of BCC to talk show host Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) as well as the foreign investment conducted in Multi-System Operators (MSOs).
Ideally, the NCC should not approve any application unless the applicants commit to greater responsibilities and higher levels of service. By doing so, the NCC’s decisions would be more in line with the public interest.
Late last month, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) “conditionally” approved Sirius Satellite Radio’s US$3.3 billion buyout of XM Satellite Radio with a three-to-two vote after a review of almost 500 days.
The FCC required Sirius to not increase its fees for three years and to set aside 12 channels — about 8 percent of its total number of channels — so that they could be used by educational and minority broadcasters. The FCC also required Sirius to allow users to purchase individual channels selectively and forced it to pay a previous US$19.7 million fine issued by the FCC.
Here in Taiwan, the NCC also has the power to approve or disapprove a deal. After an applicant decides to accept or reject a deal through calculation of gains and losses, the NCC always has the final say.
The NCC should make decisions based on maximizing public interest and should not use the law as an excuse during its decision-making process. It should also not pass the buck to other agencies.
Unfortunately, in the cases of CTV, BCC and MSOs, the NCC failed to exercise its power for the good of the public.
Lo Shih-hung is an associate professor at National Chung Cheng University’s Department of Communications.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US