The rage for sushi and sashimi, Japan’s raw fish dishes that overtook the West and have now spread to increasingly prosperous China, risks wiping out one of the Mediterranean’s most emblematic residents: the bluefin tuna.
Experts say too many of these majestic fish prized since Greek and Roman times — each one of which can weigh up to 900kg — are ending up on the platters of restaurants around the globe.
“Japanese consumption was already a threat to bluefin tuna in the Mediterranean. The European craze for sushi bars has added to that,” said Roberto Mielgo Bregazzi, a Spanish expert and author of several reports for Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund.
”If the Chinese market continues to grow, that will be the end of the stock,” he said.
Eating Japanese-style raw fish in rice packages spread to Europe and the US in the 1990s and quickly grabbed palates there.
China seems to be next, said Bregazzi who added that there had been a significant increase in tuna consumption there in the past six years.
Even though there are few official figures on Chinese consumption, the trend has also been observed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), a body responsible for managing bluefin tuna fishing.
Japan, however, remains the main consumer of bluefin tuna.
“Around 80 percent to 85 percent of bluefin tuna caught in the Mediterranean is exported to Japan,” said Jean-Marc Fromentin, a leading worldwide expert on the subject at the French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea.
Sushi consumption took off after World War II, largely using southern bluefish tuna then found in huge numbers off the coast of Australia.
“This stock has now collapsed thanks to over-fishing, and the Japanese turned their attention to the Atlantic bluefin tuna,” said Fromentin, adding that despite its name, Atlantic bluefin comes mainly from the Mediterranean.
Prices began to climb. Fishing fleets were modernized in Europe and new fishing fleets were created in Turkey and northern Africa. The result — a huge overcapacity in fishing.
Today more than 50,000 tonnes of bluefin tuna are caught every year in the Mediterranean. To prevent stocks from collapsing, that figure should be limited to 15,000 tonnes in the short term, ICCAT said.
“The bluefin tuna industry is in the process of fishing itself to death,” Greenpeace oceans campaigner Karli Thomas said.
The risk now is that the depletion of tuna will wipe out the fishing sector, and cost thousands of jobs in the Mediterranean region.
In May and June, fishermen from France, Italy, Libya, Malta, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey are under pressure to maximize their catch. Most use a net called a “purse seine,” which is weighted to reach the sea floor, with hoops and ropes which allow the fishermen to pull the drawstrings and trap the bluefin tuna within the net.
They work out of ultra-modern trawlers, up to 60m long and costing around 5 million euros (US$8 million).
At this point in the chain, a kilo of bluefin tuna fetches the fisherman between 8 euros and 10 euros. The catch is sold to tuna fattening farms, many located in Cypriot, Croatian, Maltese, Sicilian, Spanish and Tunisian waters and many owned by Japanese companies like Mitsubishi, Maruha or Mitsui or the Spanish group Ricardo Fuentes e Hijos.
The tuna are transported to these offshore farms in huge circular cages 50m in diameter and 23m deep. Once in the tuna farms, or ranches as they are sometimes known, the tuna gorge on tonnes of sardines, mackerel and herring.
This boosts their weight to the demands of the Japanese buyers. Some farms also feed the tuna freeze-dried garlic to stimulate their blood circulation or prawns to boost their reddish tinge.
It takes between 9kg and 20kg of small fish to put 1kg of weight on a bluefin tuna, said a co-owner of the Fish and Fish Farm in Malta, Joseph Caruana.
The fattened tuna are then sold at around 13 euros per kilogram to Japanese buyers, who in turn sell them for a much higher price in Tokyo — where a good quality, 200kg tuna can fetch up to 20,000 euros.
“It is the big firms that push the fishermen into over-fishing,” Bregazzi said.
In theory, the bluefin tuna harvest is monitored so that the ICCAT quotas are respected, but there are numerous flaws.
This year, the European Commission — the EU executive — has clamped down somewhat. Fishing was even put on hold for 15 days for some countries — a decision that infuriated French and Italian fishing fleets in particular.
“But the Turkish tuna seiners continued to fish, and there is always the illegal fishing by Japan and [South] Korea,” French fisherman Andre Fortassier said.
Fishing and farms have also developed in non-EU countries in recent years, including Libya, Tunisia and Algeria where quota controls tend to be looser, industry sources said.
For Sergi Tudela, a Spanish marine biologist with Worldwide Fund for Nature, the responsibility lies with ICCAT.
“If important parties in ICCAT such as the US, the European Union and Japan decide to put an end to this unsustainable situation and to adopt real recovery measures, the other countries should accept them,” he said.
“Japan is the key market. If there is a real willingness from Japan to ensure that only real sustainable production is being imported, they can implement that,” Tudela said.
“The potentiality is there, it only lacks political will,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past