In the 1990s, the US had a trade deficit with Taiwan of more than US$20 billion. In response, the US used Section 301 of the US Trade Act to impose trade sanctions on Taiwan.
Last year, the US had a trade deficit of more than US$256 billion with China. US President George W. Bush’s administration has vowed to reduce this deficit and Congress has been applying constant pressure on Beijing while also trying to punish China economically.
The US is a market-based capitalist economy and its huge trade deficit with China is potentially dangerous for Taiwan. The government should take early action to minimize risk, otherwise Taiwan could very well lose the increasingly large trade surplus it has with China.
Last year, Taiwan had a 60 percent investment ratio in China, China’s export dependence on Taiwan was more than 40 percent and Taiwan’s trade surplus with China was US$77 billion. In order to stop constant appreciation of the Chinese yuan because of an over-dependence on exports and foreign investment, China will have to increase internal demand.
The slow growth of the US and Japanese economies will make China’s import market shrink and its export dependence on Taiwan will increase, which means that Taiwan’s trade surplus will also increase. As a result, the Taiwanese economy will come to rely more on China.
We should think about a future when China might be able to copy the expertise of Taiwanese companies. This would make China less reliant on Taiwanese technical skills and funds and it might boycott Taiwanese products. The government should pay attention now before this happens and take pre-emptive action.
Chinese economists and government officials have been talking constantly about the importance of China to Taiwan’s economic growth, saying that without its trade surplus with China, Taiwan would not be able to handle its deficit with Japan. Some have even said that Taiwan would be in deficit with all its trading partners without China.
These comments must be cleared up, as they are erroneous and are aimed at diminishing Taiwan’s importance in cross-strait economic talks.
More than 97 percent of Taiwan’s exports to China are raw materials, intermediate goods and machinery, while consumer products account for only 3 percent. This shows that Taiwan’s trade surplus with China is a result of the money invested by Taiwanese businesspeople in China. While Taiwan was accumulating this trade surplus, China enjoyed benefits such as increased employment, technological upgrades, the accumulation of foreign currency and increases in income. Therefore, cross-strait trade is not just about China bringing opportunities to Taiwan as Beijing keeps saying.
In addition, if the Chinese market did not exist, things would be the same as they were before links between Taiwan and China were stepped up. Taiwanese businesspeople would invest their money in the US, Japan, Europe and Southeast Asia and just export the same amount of raw materials, intermediate goods and machinery to these countries. Taiwan might even have had a trade surplus with every nation in the world.
Taiwan must try hard to maintain its technological edge and guard against letting all of its technology fall into the hands of Chinese companies.This would ensure that China continues to rely on imports of Taiwanese high-end components and semi-finished products, making it impossible for Beijing to impose trade sanctions on Taiwan. It would also help Taiwan avoid the threats to business that would be caused by an upgrading of industries in China.
Kuo Kuo-hsing is an associate professor of international trade at Chinese Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS