Sultan al-Mazeen recently stopped at a gas station to fill up his SUV, paying US$0.45 a gallon (US$0.12 per liter) — a price Americans could only dream of as they pay nearly 10 times that at the pump.
But cheap gas and the record wealth pouring into Saudi Arabia’s coffers from high oil prices are little relief for al-Mazeen. The 36-year-old Saudi technician and many other Saudis say they’re only feeling poorer amid the oil boom because of inflation that has hit 30-year highs in the kingdom.
“I tell the Americans, don’t feel envious because gas is cheaper here,” said al-Mazeen. “We’re worse off than before.”
While Saudis don’t feel the pain at the pump, they feel it everywhere else, paying more at grocery stores and restaurants and for rent and construction material. While the country is getting richer selling oil at prices that climbed to a record US$145 last week, inflation has reached almost 11 percent, breaking double-digits for the first time since the late 1970s.
“Gas prices are low here, so what?” said Muhammad Abdullah, a 60-year-old retiree. “What can I do with gas? Drink it? Take it with me to the supermarket?”
Al-Mazeen says his monthly grocery bill has doubled — to US$215 — compared with last year, when oil was at around US$70 a barrel. During that time period, the price of rice has doubled to about US$0.72 cents a pound (0.45kg), and a pound of meat has gone up more than a third to about US$4.
Moreover, Saudis are grappling with unemployment — estimated at 30 percent among youths aged 16 to 26 — and a stock market that is down 10 percent since the beginning of the year.
Many Saudis are realizing that this oil boom will not have the same impact as the one in the 1970, which raised Saudis from rags to riches. This time, the wealth isn’t trickling down as fast or in the same quantities.
One reason is the kingdom’s growing population, says John Sfakianakis, chief economist at the Saudi British Bank (SABB). In the 1970s, the population of Saudi Arabia was 9.5 million. Today, it’s 27.6 million, including 22 million Saudi citizens.
That means the state, which controls nearly all oil income, has to spread the wealth among more people. Besides the country’s generous welfare system of free education and other benefits for citizens, the public sector employs some 2 million people, and 65 percent of the budget goes to salaries.
“The state, yes, is wealthier, but the state has close to three times the amount of people it has to cater for,” said Sfakianakis. “Even if Saudi Arabia had lower inflation, the country and the needs of the country are bigger than what they used to be.”
So the government has less room to raise wages to help people deal with higher prices. The United Arab Emirates recently hiked public sector wages by 70 percent — but if the Saudis did they same, they would have been hit by deficits, Sfakianakis added.
Contrary to their image in the West, Saudis are far from the wealthiest people of the Gulf, where many countries have much smaller populations and so can spread the riches faster. The kingdom’s per capita income is US$20,700 — compared to Qatar, which has a population of around a half million citizens and a per capita income of US$67,000.
In a recent interview with Kuwait’s Al-Siyassah newspaper, King Abdullah said “officials have suitable solutions” and plans to fight inflation.
“The government can use its money to offset the soaring prices of basic commodities. The kingdom will also use its financial reserves to combat inflation and bring everything back to normal,” the king was quoted as saying, without elaborating.
Economists say the main source of inflation is higher domestic demand for apartments, office space and food — at a time when world prices for food and raw materials is rising. A statement issued by the Economy and Planning Ministry on Saturday said that the rental index, which includes rents, fuel and water, has soared 18.5 percent while food and beverage costs have increased by 15.1 percent.
Saudi inflation is also exacerbated by the weak dollar, because the riyal is pegged to the US currency, increasing the cost of imports — and the kingdom imports most of its essential goods.
The influx of oil money itself into the economy also is a factor, but it is not as major a cause of inflation as the other issues, said Sfakianakis and other economists.
In a sign that inflation will not dissipate any time soon, the Saudi Cabinet decided on March 31 to reduce customs duties on 180 major foodstuffs, consumer goods and construction materials for at least three years, according to a report Sfakianakis wrote for SABB.
Still, the kingdom is set to make a large budget surplus because of high oil prices this year. Oil export revenue is expected to reach US$260 billion this year, according to a report last month by Jadwa Investment, a private Saudi firm. This compares with an average of just US$43 billion per year throughout the 1990s, the report said. It forecast that the budget surplus will be US$69 billion this year compared to US$47.6 billion last year.
But Saudi Arabia puts much of its oil income into investments and assets abroad, in part as a hedge in case oil prices drop in the future, squeezing the budget.
Sheik Abdul-Aziz al Sheikh, the kingdom’s grand mufti and top religious authority, has urged the government to fix prices on essential commodities.
“Every effort should be made to contain rising prices of goods all over the kingdom,” the mufti said during a sermon in Riyadh in February, the Arab News daily reported.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS