In the scorching heat of the Arizona desert, Singaporean F-16 aviators and maintenance technicians are training at Luke Air Force Base under the watchful eye of US Air Force officers in a regime that is as much a cross-cultural exchange as school for aerial combat.
The Singaporeans train here because Luke’s air space is twice as large as Singapore’s air space and has bombing and gunnery ranges that would be impossible to find in the Southeast Asian city-state. Moreover, the Singaporeans fly in exercises such as Red Flag at Nellis AFB in Nevada, Red Flag Alaska, and Maple Flag in Canada in which they simulate combat against trained US “aggressor” flyers.
The aviators, here for two years, come for what Lieutenant Colonel Stephen Granger of the US Air Force (USAF) called “high-end training” in the interception of enemy attackers, firing missiles beyond visual range, low-level navigation, infrared targeting, laser-guided bombing and night operations using powerful night vision goggles. Colonel Granger commands the 425th Fighter Squadron to which the Singaporeans are assigned.
The threats confronting Singapore today are piracy and terror in the Straits of Malacca and South China Sea through which more cargo ships and tankers pass annually than through the Suez Canal and Panama Canal combined. Parts of that trading route are crucial to Singapore’s vibrant economy. This passage is also critical to US Navy warships sailing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Any blockage would cause economic and strategic havoc.
Less evident and at a longer range, say Asian strategists, Singapore’s air force is part of a deterrent aimed at Malaysia, just across the Strait of Johore to the north, and China, which claims large parts of the South China Sea. The 425th’s nickname is the Black Widows.
Colonel Granger, who has four other USAF pilots and 26 civilians on his staff, has operational control over the Singaporeans and is responsible for their training. A Singaporean, Lieutenant Colonel Vincent Leong, is responsible for discipline and administration. Singapore’s Ministry of Defense, without explanation, would not allow Colonel Leong or other Singaporean pilots to be interviewed.
For the Singaporeans, training in the desert is an anomaly since most of their flights at home are over water. Colonel Granger said that made little difference at middle and high altitudes but acknowledged that flying low over water with no terrain features was more difficult than flying low over land where terrain features were discernible.
Singapore has 12 F-16s here, half of them two-seater D models with room for a weapons officer to operate targeting and defensive sensors and to drop bombs. Those planes appear to be especially useful for operations over water.
Among the differences in culture, Colonel Granger said, was that “the Singaporeans are very rank conscious.” A captain is not likely to criticize a major in a meeting in which a training flight is being scrubbed for lessons learned. In contrast, USAF junior officers are expected to speak up when they see a senior officer make a mistake.
The size of the US sometimes overwhelms the Singaporeans, most of whom have never been out of their city-state. Flying north to Canada to take part in Maple Flag drills, Colonel Granger said, the Singaporeans were often eager to take pictures.
On average, Singapore has about 150 people training at the facilities at any one time, 15 being aviators and the rest maintenance technicians. In addition, most bring their families with them and live in quarters on the base. That keeps Colonel Granger and his staff busy easing the culture shock of the Singaporeans.
Colonel Granger, who became squadron commander only a few months ago, has never been to Singapore but seemed to relish the challenge of learning to work with the Singaporeans. He plans to visit Singapore in August in a US delegation to mark Singapore’s national day.
The colonel said Singapore pays for the entire operation of the 425th squadron, including the F-16s, their fuel, spare parts and munitions. Singapore even covers his pay and that of the 30 other Americans assigned to the squadron. The F-16s cost US$23 million each, an F-16 Web site said, but neither the USAF nor Singapore’s Ministry of Defense would disclose the annual cost of the 425th’s operations.
The squadron has a long history in the USAF, fighting in Europe in World War II. In its present incarnation, it was assigned to train Singaporeans in 1992. The current agreement with the US Air Force runs to 2018.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS