President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said he hopes that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Youth League can produce a person like Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). In saying this, Ma is himself becoming increasingly similar to Hu. In terms of anti-democratic and anti-Japanese sentiment and singing praises for communist autocracy, Ma and Hu are now almost comrades who dance to the same tune.
On the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) issue, Hu permitted angry youths in China to express anti-Japanese sentiment to demonstrate the importance China places on issues of sovereignty.
But Hu is playing politics — the Diaoyutai islets are only 4km² in size. If China holds sovereignty in high regard, why would it sign an agreement with Moscow to waive its claim to land that was taken away by Russia to the equivalent of 360,000 Diaoyutais?
The same goes for Ma. If the KMT considers sovereignty to be important, why does it not pursue the 9.6 million square kilometers of territory that belonged to the Republic of China that is under communist control?
Ma’s approval of anti-Japanese sentiment is also a game aimed at diverting attention from the fact that his inauguration was closely followed by a huge drop in the stock market, hikes in oil, gaffes by his appointees and a manifest lack of political ability.
In his annual comments on the Tiananmen Square Massacre, Ma praised China’s rescue efforts after the Sichuan earthquake.
What does the earthquake have to do with Tiananmen? The massacre was mass murder.
Besides, in the crucial 72 hours that followed the earthquake, Hu’s government refused assistance that was offered by other countries, including Taiwan. It is difficult to ascertain just how many people lost their lives under rubble because of the delay in assistance. Still, this is another form of murder. Disregard for life because of ideology is the most sinful act of an autocratic power. But Ma lacked the sense to take this into account.
Even more outrageous is the fact that Ma once won the admiration of Chinese democracy activists for condemning the massacre. Immediately after his inauguration, however, Ma said nothing of substance.
Some Chinese writers were outraged and this is perfectly understandable. Beijing-based author Liu Zili (劉自立) decried Ma’s fawning over Beijing and said his stance on the Tiananmen Square Massacre as debauched.
Liao Tien-chi (廖天琪), the editor of Observer (觀察), a magazine published by the China Information Center, said that Ma’s praise for China made his blood boil. A Mainlander who grew up in Taiwan, Liao wrote that it was pitiful for the Taiwanese people to have given their fate over to someone like Ma, and that Ma’s speech on the anniversary of the massacre made him feel as if Taiwanese needed an elegy to lament their new president.
Pu Ta-chung (卜大中), chief writer at the Chinese-language Apple Daily, offered up more severe language. He said Ma’s address on the anniversary of Tiananmen substituted the earthquake for the issues of democracy and human rights, in what amounted to a sleight of hand.
On Ma’s praise for media liberalization in China, Pu retorted that the government should not be intervening in the media in the first place, so “liberalization” shouldn’t be an issue; praise for “liberalization” was thus worthless. Pu likened the situation to a criminal who is praised for merely raping when he is accustomed to raping and pillaging.
Ma’s fawning over China can be readily pictured in the mind. It can even be understood.
Yet his emulation of Hu so soon after his inauguration leaves one flabbergasted.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS