A Taiwanese menage a trois
Dear Johnny,
As a keen observer of world politics and as a news junkie temporarily domiciled in Taiwan, I have no choice but to read your refreshing columns. I take it you are a lone liberal voice in this vast concrete jungle of a heavily industrialized island that has no name.
It is comforting to learn that the island does have a small village as a provincial capital and that the principalities of Taipei and Kaohsiung (or whatever Romanized spelling turns you on) are affiliated with the KMT provinces of Mongolia and Tibet. I suppose it is currently difficult for the KMT to grant independence to Tibet because of delicate negotiations with its erstwhile enemies. One would have thought that the DPP and your ilk would have some sympathy for the Chicoms, if only because they also used to be enemies of the KMT.
Let’s even assume that unadulterated communism and socialism offer more hope than the US cowboy capitalism practiced with such verve here on this island without a name — well, shouldn’t the DPP look left and start negotiating for comradely independence with the last of the true-red Chicoms (most of whom have already turned true blue)? Could it be that you are allowed to be a liberal voice just because you’re down on the Chicoms? Could it be that your professed love for “your” country without a name — let’s call it Taiwan nevertheless — is your ticket to practice journalism?
I don’t think you fall into the category of the scoundrel whose last refuge is patriotism, but I do get the impression that you are — unwittingly — part of the media machine that manufactures consent (ala Hermann and Chomsky). The facade of a liberal democracy must be upheld by jokers like you and me, just as we descend into a neo-feudalism that allows us at best to be fools on the hill, hobnobbing with the rich and famous, eager to prick their non-existent social conscience with our voodoo needles, to make them smirk with satisfaction as they read their names in your news column, following the US show-business mantra of “bad publicity is better than no publicity.”
For the sake of our sanity and our jobs let’s just hope that Falun Gong turns into a major political party that — after the much-anticipated fall of the Chicoms — will win the elections and appoint the Dalai Lama as president of One China, including Tibet and Taiwan. I’m not so sure about the Mongolians though.
I think you’ll have a wonderful time being incarcerated in Lhasa for insulting the king of Thailand. You will be joined by a former president, Mr Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who will correctly apply his dictum of “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” and send himself into spiritual exile, reading Maoist texts sent to him by the government in Nepal. Ultimately both of you will be rescued by Indiana Jones, as at least one of you holds a green card. I think you’ll make a great press secretary for President Obama and his wife Hillary.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
PS: You do know that Bill Clinton got divorced after being seen playing the saxophone under Michelle Obama’s window. A real swinger, no?
PPS: As a highly respected academic at a highly respected university in Taoyuan, I do hope you’ll offer me a regular column in line with other laptop professors who desperately want to become president (of the university) and then minister of education. Funny how academia, commerce and politics engage in this sultry Taiwanese version of a menage a trios, eh? Hot stuff for an investigative journalist like yourself!
Johnny replies: Thanks for the rant, Wolfgang. You’ve helped me confirm that the air in Taoyuan is even worse than in Neihu. Especially with that gag about yours truly unwittingly manufacturing consent. Chomsky ... hah! I eat Chomskys for breakfast.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS