The sinking of a Taiwanese fishing boat off the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands is a litmus test for the future development of relations between Taiwan and Japan. It also gives China a chance to reassert its claim of sovereignty over Taiwan and the Diaoyutai islands.
After the incident, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang (秦剛) reiterated that the Diaoyutais are part of Chinese territory and demanded that the Japanese Coast Guard stop any illegal encroachment into Chinese territorial waters. This came at a time when Taiwan-China relations were firming following the inauguration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Every time such an incident happens, there is consensus that Taiwan and Japan should hasten to resolve the issue of fishing rights. The problem is how. Over the past dozen years, the two sides have held 15 meetings to discuss the issue without reaching any substantial agreement. The main reasons are as follows.
First, Beijing has intervened, saying Sino-Japanese fishery agreements already exist. In its view, as part of China, Taiwan is regulated by these. If Japan negotiates agreements unilaterally with Taiwan, it will violate the “one China” principle.
Second, Taiwan and Japan differ in their claims of jurisdiction over the disputed waters. One reason little progress has been made is neither side is willing to concede its own advocated temporary enforcement line and geographical central line. For Japan the central line principle is not only regulated in laws dealing with its exclusive economic zone but is also one of its main arguments for resisting Chinese oil exploration, making it unlikely that Japan will compromise on this issue.
Third, although Taiwan passed the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf of the Republic of China Act (專屬經濟海域及大陸礁層法) in 1998, the government has yet to declare the outer boundaries of the nation’s exclusive economic zone, hence Taiwan’s claim of sovereignty cannot be effectively addressed.
Whether the government can resolve these problems is key to a future resolution of the situation. However, the long-term outlook is not necessarily negative. Faced with Chinese interference, the Japanese government positioned fishery negotiations with Taiwan as non-state fishery agreements from the start and does not think they will affect relations with China. Whether Ma’s administration can handle the pressure from China’s “united front” strategy on this issue is another interesting issue.
In terms of the legal aspects of drawing boundaries, the government should behave as a sovereign state and issue an unambiguous proclamation of its outer boundaries of its exclusive economic zone. If it decides not to assert its claim because of concerns about pressure from neighboring countries, it will be restricting its own freedom. It stands to reason that a sovereign country defines the maritime area under its jurisdiction in accordance with the Law of the Sea. The opinions of other countries do not affect the legality of a country’s proclamation of maritime jurisdiction in itself, although this won’t stop dissent from other countries. The delimitation of overlapping boundaries should be resolved through peaceful consultation.
Furthermore, the 1997 Sino-Japanese fishery agreement set up a temporary co-management fishery zone between latitude 27ºN and 34.4ºN, which suggests that both sides have agreed to shelve disputes over sovereignty and restrict themselves to finding solutions to fishery issues.
Taiwan and Japan should also engage in pragmatic negations based on a consensus that there is controversy over the sovereignty of the Diaoyutai islands.
Chiang Shih-hsiung is a student of the Graduate School of Law at Kobe University in Japan.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past