A former senior official in US President George W. Bush’s White House has dropped a proverbial bombshell by asserting that the US and South Korea have no coordinated plan to cope with a collapse of the North Korean regime of “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-il, a prospect that becomes more possible with each passing day.
Victor Cha, who was director of Asian affairs at the US National Security Council (NSC) from 2004 until last year, wrote last week: “In what would be the single most important contingency that could impact the South Korean economy and security for decades, there is no agreed upon plan for how to deal with a collapsing North Korea.”
In response to an e-mail asking: “Why was no plan drawn up when you were on the NSC staff in the White House?” Cha replied: “There is no lack of planning on the US government side. We’ve done our part.”
Cha, who has returned to Georgetown University in Washington as director of Asian Studies, continued: “The issue is that there is no agreed upon mechanism for bilateral, trilateral or other planning (including China), which obviously should be done in advance of such a contingency.”
In an article in the Chosun Ilbo, a leading South Korean newspaper, Cha blamed former South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun, whose term ended in February.
“The Roh Moo-hyun government,” Cha said, “rejected planning discussions because it believed such discussions would offend Pyongyang and give the impression the US and Seoul were actively conspiring to collapse the regime.”
Cha, a Korean-American who speaks fluent Korean, disclosed the gap between the US and South Korea as massed anti-US demonstrations broke out in Seoul. The reason for the protests was supposedly an agreement by the new government of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak to permit the US to export beef to South Korea. That seemed to be an excuse for deep-seated anti-Americanism to erupt.
In addition, South Koreans were angered by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who was perceived to have denigrated the US alliance with South Korea in an article in the prominent journal Foreign Affairs. Many South Koreans contended that she had dropped the importance of South Korea to the US a notch below that of Japan, always a sensitive issue for Koreans, whose land was occupied by Japan from 1910 to 1945.
In the event of a North Korean implosion, Cha suggested in his Chosun Ilbo essay that the US “should be responsible for securing all weapons of mass destruction and missiles sites.” That would require US armed forces in South Korea to drive north, perhaps reinforced by troops from Alaska and Hawaii. At the same time, Cha suggested, Chinese forces would “secure a buffer along the Yalu River to prevent an outflow of North Korean refugees into China.” Moreover, those forces “might secure that buffer south [rather than north] of the Yalu in order to be effective.”
That raised the possibility that Chinese and US troops might confront each other in North Korea.
“The key with China in a North Korea contingency is to reduce uncertainty or potential for misperception,” Cha said.
The critical issue, Cha said, is transparency — “knowing what the other side is doing in a contingency and why they are doing it.”
On the potential for a North Korean collapse, Cha was understated.
“Kim Jong-il is not getting any younger,” he wrote. “The food situation is not getting better.”
He labeled the authoritarian North Korean political system “brittle.”
A pro-North Korean organization in South Korea that calls itself “Good Friends” seeks to generate sympathy for North Koreans by reporting on their plight, which borders on famine. On the Internet it quoted Kim as saying: “There is nothing more important and pressing as resolving the food shortage for the people.”
Good Friends, which refuses to disclose the source of its funds or information, said the food crisis is so severe that even military officers, who take top priority under Kim’s “military first” policy, get only two meals of porridge a day.
“This would be the first time in the history of our country that the military is eating porridge,” Good Friends quoted a North Korean official as saying.
Moreover, rumors of Kim’s ill health or that he had been assassinated trickle out from Pyongyang. Such gossip led Cha to advocate that the governments of South Korea, Japan, China and the US forge a plan to cope with a collapse.
“It has to be done — and done well,” he said, “before the next rumor proves to be true.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past