DPP should tackle Diaoyutais
It is not unlikely that right now various personnel in the US State Department are regretting their decision to implicitly undermine the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government and help elect “Mr Ma” [Ying-jeou (馬英九)] as president.
The “crisis” over the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands has already demonstrated that not only is the president unable or unwilling to act decisively, instead choosing to relegate the authority of the presidency to a symbolic level, he also has little or no control over legislators and members of his own party.
During the DPP’s eight years in power, president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) never initiated or passively supported any conflict with any nation, instead working on the philosophy laid down under former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) of responsible stewardship and international participation.
Indeed, it was Chen’s government that carried out the extensive negotiations on cross-strait links that made it possible for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to ink its recent deal. It also laid down a very healthy relationship with Japan which, after the US, represents our second-best security guarantee.
All this is now under threat because of jingoistic and immature saber-rattling at Japan designed to please Beijing. This troublemaker executive, masquerading as “reasonable” and “democratic,” is little more than a puppet show. The Republic of China (ROC) is back — for its swan song.
Taiwan’s historical, political, economic and cultural ties to Japan are of immense value and should not be allowed to stagnate because this short-sighted and voraciously greedy government rushes across the Strait to kowtow for peanuts in return.
This puerile tit-for-tat diplomatic spat with Japan demonstrates that whereas “Taiwan” was responsible, the “ROC” is willfully reckless; where “Taiwan” was steadfast, the “ROC” capitulates; and where “Taiwan” was maturing, the “ROC” throws a temper tantrum when its own citizens break long-standing maritime agreements as well as critical domestic law.
Thus the key problem underlying this dispute would seem to be an absence of the rule of law in Taiwan, a gaping hole in our democracy that allows individuals and governments to bypass or ignore the law at will. Action needs to be taken to demonstrate to Japan that Taiwan will make more efforts to respect international maritime law and behave in a manner befitting a nation that embodies such regional strategic significance.
The DPP could organize a delegation to Japan to resolve this crisis and begin negotiations for an economic and security “understanding.” There exists a good foundation for mutually respectful discussion since the Japanese learned to trust the DPP government.
DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) could ask Taiwan’s former representative to Japan Koh Se-kai (�?�) and former presidents Chen and Lee to head the group, given their experience, expertise, knowledge and good relations with Japan.
Since all of these figures are now retired from active political service, they would visit in their capacity as concerned citizens.
It would also help to assure the Japanese that whatever radical and unpredictable direction this unsteady government might make, in four years’ time they will hopefully be able to resume their partnership with a more reasonable and professional DPP administration.
Ben Goren
Keelung
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS