Japan’s salarymen, famous for their work ethic and their corporate loyalty, fueled their nation’s industrial rise. But more recently, they have borne the brunt of its economic decline, enduring lower wages, job insecurity and long hours of unpaid overtime.
Now, a few are fighting back, like Hiroshi Takano.
For years, Takano regularly worked into the wee hours as a store manager at McDonald’s Japan. With his health deteriorating and the company, which operates many restaurants here, refusing to pay overtime, Takano sued three years ago and won.
In January, a Tokyo court ordered McDonald’s Japan to pay him US$75,000 in back overtime wages. Last month, the company announced it would pay more overtime to store managers.
Slowly and reluctantly, Japan’s salarymen are learning to stand up for their rights, and in the process rewriting the social contract that had once bound workers to companies with near feudal bonds of loyalty. While this renegotiation is still under way, a new generation of Japanese like Takano is seeking to limit the demands of employers with more US-style legal protections. These changing attitudes reflect a broader shift as Japan, Asia’s first high-growth success story, struggles to mature into a postindustrial economy.
“Japanese are being forced to think more about their self-interest, which is something they are not used to doing,” said Yoichi Shimada, a law professor at Waseda University in Tokyo. “People are slowly realizing there are legal avenues to defend themselves if they feel wronged.”
According to the Supreme Court, the number of lawsuits filed against employers rose 45 percent between 1997 and 2005 to 2,303 cases. In 2006, that number increased 21 percent to 2,777 cases — if lawsuits heard by a newly created labor arbitration court are included.
Adding to the alienation between employee and company has been a growing sense of resentment that workers have not benefited from the nation’s economic rebound in the last five years.
STAGNANT
While corporate profits have soared, wages have remained stagnant, feeding a perception that companies have failed to share the good times with employees. This has led some to seek a bigger piece of the pie, say legal and labor experts.
There is also a feeling that as companies have cut costs to remain competitive with China and South Korea, they passed too much of the burden onto employees. In particular, many of the recent lawsuits involve a practice known as “service overtime,” in which workers were silently pressured into logging long hours of unpaid overtime as a display of loyalty, labor experts say.
“Japanese companies have used the silence of their loyal employees as a weapon in international competition,” said Kiyotsugu Shitara, head of the Tokyo Managers’ Union, a small white-collar union that helped with Takano’s lawsuit against McDonald’s Japan. “Employees are tired of being used like that.”
Shitara and other labor experts said the recent rise in lawsuits was also the latest step in a longer-term move toward a more US-style workplace — also apparent in the recent rise in mid-career job hopping, once a rarity here.
Still, many employees involved in the lawsuits describe themselves as reluctant revolutionaries, dragged into a new, more legalistic era to which they have no choice but to adapt.
Some, like Takano, blame the indifferent attitudes of companies for forcing them to fight back when they would just as soon return to the old, cozy relationship between employer and employee.
“I didn’t want to do this,” said Takano, 46, who still manages a McDonald’s store in a Tokyo suburb. “The company was treating me too coldly, so I had to start protecting my own rights.”
Another reluctant plaintiff was Hiroko Uchino, who filed a lawsuit against the government after her husband, Kenichi, 30, a quality control officer at Toyota, died at his office six years ago. Uchino wanted a government labor agency to legally recognize that he had died from overwork, something so common that there is a Japanese word for it, karoshi.
LEGAL ACTION
She took legal action after the company said her husband’s death was not because of overwork, and that he had only worked about 38 hours of overtime in January 2002, the month before he died. She said the company ignored her when she tried to submit gas station receipts and other evidence to show he had worked much longer hours: 155 that January, by Uchino’s calculation. She said the company said he stayed after work voluntarily, and was not entitled to overtime pay.
Despite her outrage, Uchino could not bring herself to legally challenge the auto giant, which dominates the central city of Nagoya where she lives, and had employed not only her husband but his father and grandfather before him. She sued the labor agency instead to receive more of his overtime pay.
Uchino’s case won wide sympathy, including a meeting with the labor minister, who gave her words of support. In March, a court in Nagoya ruled her husband’s death had been work-related, and that he had worked 93 hours of overtime in his final month, entitling his widow to additional overtime pay. Toyota had no comment on the case.
“His father would never have turned to the courts, no matter what,” said Uchino, 38. “But Toyota never would have treated him this way, either. These days, all the company talks about is reducing expenses.”
She added: “If my husband had known how the company would react, he never would have shown all this fruitless loyalty.”
Takano said he had been working from 6am to 1am managing two stores before his lawsuit, in some cases seven days a week. McDonald’s Japan said that as a white-collar manager he was not entitled to overtime pay. After a doctor warned him he was at risk of a stroke, Takano said he had wavered on whether to file a lawsuit — he liked McDonald’s and wanted to keep his job. Now, he hoped the case would improve working conditions for all managers.
The company had no comment on the case.
After the court victory, four other former McDonald’s store managers filed a similar suit demanding compensation for unpaid overtime. Legal experts say more could come throughout the fast-food industry.
“I want Japan to become a society where employees can sue their own company,” Takano said. “That’s why I’m doing this.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers