Aside from economic topics, the meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) reconfirmed plans for the “gift” of two giant pandas to Taiwan. In response to questions during a legislative interpellation session, Minister of Agriculture Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) said that, in principle, the sooner the pandas arrive, the better.
But China’s gifts of giant pandas have almost always been related to political purposes — and Beijing has made little effort to disguise that fact. Taiwan has no zoo or research group that has made any contribution to the conservation of giant pandas. We are, in a sense, not fully deserving of these creatures. We could very possibly waste the breeding potential of the two pandas, for although Sichuan breeders have had impressive success in breeding, other facilities around the world have been very unsuccessful. Giant pandas are also very costly and would likely affect the budget for indigenous wildlife conservation.
In the last 20 years, Taiwan has more than once refused China’s pandas. The most common reason for rejecting them was political — such as resisting Beijing’s unification tactics, political penetration or attempts to denigrate Taiwan — rather than humanitarian or conservationist considerations. Even two years ago, it was not difficult to see the traces of political correctness in the findings of a team of experts organized by the Council of Agriculture.
In a situation where top policymakers can decide to welcome the pandas or not, it could be very difficult to conduct an objective and professional assessment of the issue. But several aspects should be taken into consideration.
Any pandas dispatched to Taiwan should not be fertile; otherwise the adopting agency must propose practical measures to ensure that their breeding potential will not be wasted. If a panda is fertile, applicants for adoption should have the ability to care for potential cubs adequately in the long term. Applicants must also make concrete and feasible promises to contribute to panda conservation, and they should do likewise toward conserving indigenous wildlife.
Even if authorities decide to reject the pandas, the decision should be made from the point of conservation, with the promise that efforts in conservation will be bolstered. Without the pandas, there is less political incentive to further conservation efforts, but it would nevertheless be an opportunity to exercise our spirit of conservation, which need not be reliant on other considerations.
In the early 1990s, Taiwan faced international criticism for its role in the smuggling of rhinoceros horns, tiger bones, bear gall and other traditional medicine materials to the point of facing trade sanctions from the US. The government responded positively to the wave of internal and external pressure and increased its regard and budget for wildlife conservation. Ever since, even without further crises or inducement, the government and the public have gradually increased their investment in conservation. Apparently we no longer consider the value of conservation from an entirely utilitarian perspective.
Although there is still much room for improvement in Taiwan in terms of wildlife conservation, we have nevertheless been heading in the right direction for the last decade and have in the process built a sound international reputation. It would not be worthwhile to go backward now. The pros and cons of adopting the pandas must be carefully weighed.
Kurtis Pei is a professor at National Pingtung University’s Institute of Wildlife Preservation.
Translated by Angela Hong
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;