Aside from economic topics, the meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) reconfirmed plans for the “gift” of two giant pandas to Taiwan. In response to questions during a legislative interpellation session, Minister of Agriculture Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) said that, in principle, the sooner the pandas arrive, the better.
But China’s gifts of giant pandas have almost always been related to political purposes — and Beijing has made little effort to disguise that fact. Taiwan has no zoo or research group that has made any contribution to the conservation of giant pandas. We are, in a sense, not fully deserving of these creatures. We could very possibly waste the breeding potential of the two pandas, for although Sichuan breeders have had impressive success in breeding, other facilities around the world have been very unsuccessful. Giant pandas are also very costly and would likely affect the budget for indigenous wildlife conservation.
In the last 20 years, Taiwan has more than once refused China’s pandas. The most common reason for rejecting them was political — such as resisting Beijing’s unification tactics, political penetration or attempts to denigrate Taiwan — rather than humanitarian or conservationist considerations. Even two years ago, it was not difficult to see the traces of political correctness in the findings of a team of experts organized by the Council of Agriculture.
In a situation where top policymakers can decide to welcome the pandas or not, it could be very difficult to conduct an objective and professional assessment of the issue. But several aspects should be taken into consideration.
Any pandas dispatched to Taiwan should not be fertile; otherwise the adopting agency must propose practical measures to ensure that their breeding potential will not be wasted. If a panda is fertile, applicants for adoption should have the ability to care for potential cubs adequately in the long term. Applicants must also make concrete and feasible promises to contribute to panda conservation, and they should do likewise toward conserving indigenous wildlife.
Even if authorities decide to reject the pandas, the decision should be made from the point of conservation, with the promise that efforts in conservation will be bolstered. Without the pandas, there is less political incentive to further conservation efforts, but it would nevertheless be an opportunity to exercise our spirit of conservation, which need not be reliant on other considerations.
In the early 1990s, Taiwan faced international criticism for its role in the smuggling of rhinoceros horns, tiger bones, bear gall and other traditional medicine materials to the point of facing trade sanctions from the US. The government responded positively to the wave of internal and external pressure and increased its regard and budget for wildlife conservation. Ever since, even without further crises or inducement, the government and the public have gradually increased their investment in conservation. Apparently we no longer consider the value of conservation from an entirely utilitarian perspective.
Although there is still much room for improvement in Taiwan in terms of wildlife conservation, we have nevertheless been heading in the right direction for the last decade and have in the process built a sound international reputation. It would not be worthwhile to go backward now. The pros and cons of adopting the pandas must be carefully weighed.
Kurtis Pei is a professor at National Pingtung University’s Institute of Wildlife Preservation.
Translated by Angela Hong
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
RSS