The legislature is planning to slap a NT$30,000 fine on government officials who are absent from meetings in the legislature without cause or try to avoid interpellation sessions. The proposal is the latest bid to extend legislative control over the Cabinet beyond its constitutionally guaranteed powers to review and amend government bills and budgets. The proposed measure is a double-edged sword that will put pressure on government officials and restrict legislators themselves.
If legislators want to complain about absences or take action to ensure government ministers and officials are doing their jobs, they should first clean up their own attendance records. If fining no-show officials proves effective, then lawmakers should face the same penalty.
The public has long had a negative view of the legislature and its members. During the early stages of democracy, the legislature was known for its brawls, video-footage of which was seen on TV stations around the world. The legislature also became known for extensive lobbying and pressure from vested interests.
Non-governmental organizations that monitor the legislature have for years criticized the low attendance rates of legislators. Yet the legislature has responded to such criticism not by trying to improve its record but by listing Citizen Congress Watch as a persona non grata in its facilities. How could such a legislature hope to win the respect of the general public or make the Cabinet accept its demands?
A legislature lacking self-respect will not gain the respect of others. Although each legislative session ends with a proclamation of how many bills were reviewed and passed — an attempt to prove that taxpayers’ money has not been wasted — quantity does not equal quality.
Despite 15 to 20 years of external criticism and internal debate, the nation’s lawmakers have proven themselves incapable of setting up an efficient internal disciplinary system, or of implementing any positive regulations they have managed to pass. The legislature’s Discipline Committee remains a paper tiger.
Following the recent change in government, the legislature is once again trying to improve its image. However, it appears concerned once again with external affairs, not its own performance. Government agencies should be supervised by the legislature and attending legislative meetings is part of the duties of a government official. Only a minority would deliberately avoid attending such meetings, and they should be criticized for doing so. However, demanding that government officials appear before legislative committees or on the floor of the legislature should not become a political cudgel.
Former vice premier Chiu I-jen (邱義仁) and former minister of education Tu Cheng-sheng (杜正勝) all missed legislative meetings and were rightly criticized for doing so. But lawmakers should also be careful to plan committee meetings so they do not coincide with the weekly Cabinet meetings or other scheduled events.
The legislature should be respected, but it must earn that respect. Leveling fines is not the way to gain respect. Lawmakers should improve their professionalism and integrity. A legislature that is respected by both itself and others would not have to fine government officials for absences: The media, government watchdog groups and the pubic would condemn such behavior.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused