The legislature is planning to slap a NT$30,000 fine on government officials who are absent from meetings in the legislature without cause or try to avoid interpellation sessions. The proposal is the latest bid to extend legislative control over the Cabinet beyond its constitutionally guaranteed powers to review and amend government bills and budgets. The proposed measure is a double-edged sword that will put pressure on government officials and restrict legislators themselves.
If legislators want to complain about absences or take action to ensure government ministers and officials are doing their jobs, they should first clean up their own attendance records. If fining no-show officials proves effective, then lawmakers should face the same penalty.
The public has long had a negative view of the legislature and its members. During the early stages of democracy, the legislature was known for its brawls, video-footage of which was seen on TV stations around the world. The legislature also became known for extensive lobbying and pressure from vested interests.
Non-governmental organizations that monitor the legislature have for years criticized the low attendance rates of legislators. Yet the legislature has responded to such criticism not by trying to improve its record but by listing Citizen Congress Watch as a persona non grata in its facilities. How could such a legislature hope to win the respect of the general public or make the Cabinet accept its demands?
A legislature lacking self-respect will not gain the respect of others. Although each legislative session ends with a proclamation of how many bills were reviewed and passed — an attempt to prove that taxpayers’ money has not been wasted — quantity does not equal quality.
Despite 15 to 20 years of external criticism and internal debate, the nation’s lawmakers have proven themselves incapable of setting up an efficient internal disciplinary system, or of implementing any positive regulations they have managed to pass. The legislature’s Discipline Committee remains a paper tiger.
Following the recent change in government, the legislature is once again trying to improve its image. However, it appears concerned once again with external affairs, not its own performance. Government agencies should be supervised by the legislature and attending legislative meetings is part of the duties of a government official. Only a minority would deliberately avoid attending such meetings, and they should be criticized for doing so. However, demanding that government officials appear before legislative committees or on the floor of the legislature should not become a political cudgel.
Former vice premier Chiu I-jen (邱義仁) and former minister of education Tu Cheng-sheng (杜正勝) all missed legislative meetings and were rightly criticized for doing so. But lawmakers should also be careful to plan committee meetings so they do not coincide with the weekly Cabinet meetings or other scheduled events.
The legislature should be respected, but it must earn that respect. Leveling fines is not the way to gain respect. Lawmakers should improve their professionalism and integrity. A legislature that is respected by both itself and others would not have to fine government officials for absences: The media, government watchdog groups and the pubic would condemn such behavior.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95