The Papua New Guinea diplomacy scandal is still raging and the whereabouts of NT$1 billion (US$32.8 million) in government funds remain unknown. This is a classic case of dereliction of duty and illegal conduct on the part of public servants. However, committee members of the Control Yuan, who are needed to enforce rules of conduct, remain absent.
The Control Yuan has been out of action for more than three years. There is now a backlog of 40,000 petitions from members of the public and more than 1,000 cases that urgently require investigation. Government agencies have enjoyed a long period without supervision; this has allowed officials to get away with improper behavior.
During the later stages of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government rule, the Control Yuan went into hiatus amid demands for reducing the five branches of government to three, public misunderstanding of the Control Yuan’s performance and the legislature’s refusal to pass nominations to the Control Yuan committee.
However, a crisis can also be a turning point: President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who supports protecting and enforcing the Constitution, has assumed office, which will likely lead to new nominations and the Control Yuan resuming operations.
For members to properly exercise their duties in building corruption-free government, the Control Yuan should be retagged as the top anti-corruption agency, which would require legal and constitutional amendments. The following are suggestions in this regard.
The term of office for committee members should be extended to eight years, with no second term, and with re-election for half of the members every four years. The president should also have the right to nominate members. Not having second terms would ensure that members would not act out of self-interest and would exercise their duties independently. Elections every four years would provide continuity and help ensure that the Control Yuan will never again be idle.
The range of people subject to investigations should be limited and the number of committee members reduced. Only civil servants, political appointees, military officials and government enterprise employees of senior rank should be subject to investigation. Public servants and others of lower rank could be investigated by their superiors and punished according to personnel regulations; in serious enough cases the matter could be transferred to the courts.
As the number of those subject to investigation decreases, committee members could focus on senior public servants and thus no longer be criticized for wasting time and resources on inconsequential matters.
Further, this would allow a proportional decrease in the number of committee members.
The Control Yuan should have the right to investigate bodies other than the Cabinet, such as the judiciary and the Examination Yuan. During investigations the Control Yuan should receive assistance from the Ministry of Audit when requiring information on personnel.
The Control Yuan should have the right to handle all cases involving human rights protection, and during investigations it should have the right to conduct searches and other necessary measures, as well being able to direct other agencies when investigating administrative cases.
It is a shame that the benefits of the Control Yuan are little known, especially as more than 120 countries have similar supervisory mechanisms. We eagerly anticipate resumption of operations, as well as legal and constitutional amendments redefining its role.
With this done, we would not be far from realizing disciplined and corruption-free government.
Lee Shen-yi is a former member of the Control Yuan.
Translated by Angela Hong
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS