Minister of Health Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) had to threaten to resign to show that he was serious, but now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has finally lent his support to raising National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums and implementing a second-generation health insurance system. On Thursday, the Cabinet also approved a change to NHI regulations that could be a shot in the arm for Taiwan’s health insurance system, which has earned praise in Taiwan and abroad.
The question now is whether implementing the second generation of the NHI will guarantee a sound system. Given the current situation, there is little reason to be optimistic.
The current plan focuses on improving the NHI’s finances by raising premiums and by calculating premiums based on annual household income instead of registered insurance subscriptions — roughly equivalent to an employee’s monthly salary.
Although the Cabinet stresses that premiums will not rise for 60 percent of those insured, premiums will rise for many to pay for the huge and constantly increasing NHI deficit.
Most people are unlikely to complain if increasing their insurance premiums by a sum equivalent to the cost of a lunchbox will help maintain a sustainable health insurance system. If they think implementing the second-generation NHI system will resolve the deficit problem, however, they are naive.
The second-generation system aims to raise premiums and increase revenues to solve the most urgent problem, but to this day, the Department of Health (DOH) hasn’t offered any concrete suggestions on how to cut expenditures. In only 13 years, from 1996 to last year, the NHI’s medical expenditures more than doubled from NT$224.8 billion (US$7.13 billion) to NT$470 billion, and it is expected to keep rising between 3 percent and 5 percent annually.
If the government doesn’t fix all the leaks, these increases will cause the deficit to skyrocket in just a few years.
The problem with health insurance expenditures is an open secret. Hospitals and clinics report an exaggerated number of patients, and doctors exaggerate their NHI expenses by extending treatments and making unnecessary examinations and operations. In addition, hospitals negotiate prices with drug companies annually to cut costs, but then report inflated prices to the Bureau of National Health Insurance. The bureau reimburses the hospitals, which pocket the difference between actual and reported prices.
These irregularities are common knowledge, so why doesn’t the second-generation NHI address these practices? Because this is a matter of shared interests. Many of the DOH’s public health policies require the cooperation of hospitals, so as long as hospitals are not too out of line, the DOH will not interfere too much with the practical aspects of their business.
Doctors and pharmaceutical companies are two of the most privileged pressure groups, and many political contributions in Taiwan’s elections come from the latter group. As soon as the debate turns toward health insurance reform, vested interests in the pharmaceutical industry that stand to lose pressure the Cabinet and legislators. Reform measures aimed at eliminating irregularities quickly fade away and debate about health insurance reform is forever doomed to address only one half of the problem — the revenue side.
As the government implements the second generation of the NHI, it should not ask the public for money while closing its eyes to the pharmaceutical industry’s behavior and allowing irregularities to continue. The government must make concrete reforms to cut expenditures — if it continues to direct reforms at only half the problem, the second-generation NHI system is doomed to failure.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS