Ahead of the next round of cross-strait talks in Taichung later this month, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has suggested that visiting Chinese officials be arrested and tried for criminal conduct in China, particularly for human rights abuses. China being what it is, there is a rich selection of such people, and the DPP, if it had its way, could make merry from blocking such officials from visiting Taiwan.
This idea is idealistic but impractical, if not nonsensical. But it does reopen debate on what level of accountability Chinese officials visiting Taiwan should be subjected to. Given that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to this day considers itself to be the most able organization to govern China, and given that Taiwan is supposedly part of China, why would such flotsam not be held accountable for abuses committed against Chinese nationals?
Once again the irony rears its head: The DPP asks a question that inadvertently requires careful thought on the future of cross-strait relations, and the KMT fails to answer it. For the KMT, on every front, on every occasion, economics is the key that will open the door to mutual prosperity and a lasting peace.
This, of course, fails to address the myriad factors that threaten peace in China — from within.
There is a large number of things that the KMT can do to address the legitimate interests of the Chinese people, whether or not Taiwanese are considered among their number. Yet the KMT is barely cognizant of the potential role that Taiwan can — and should — play in China if it is to live up to its purported role of beacon for ordinary Chinese.
Cross-strait ties must learn how to walk before they can run. Trade and financial liberalization is the obvious first step for two countries with economies already closely tied and, thus far, mutually beneficial.
But whatever economic reward or damage might result from this month’s talks, nothing can change the fact that Taiwan’s government offers nothing resembling a policy on how to deal with every other aspect of China, of which politics is a large component, but only one component.
Similarly, when foreign organizations such as the European Chamber of Commerce Taipei (ECCT) uncritically laud more intimate ties with the Chinese, caution is warranted. This is not because of the dangers inherent in closer economic ties — though these are substantial — but because the process of detente requires opening channels of communication in much more sensitive areas that only begin with politics. On such unavoidable issues — what role should Taiwan play in democratizing China and empowering ordinary Chinese? — the silence of the ECCT has been salutary: Give us the benefits, it seems to say, and the little people can worry about the rest, if they can be bothered.
As the debate over the form and intensity of contact with China continues, the problem of addressing social issues in China will be one that Taiwanese political parties will not be able to ignore.
The problem with the KMT and the DPP is that, in a classic mix of ideology and irony, both parties are entirely uninterested in social issues in China, with the exception of relief for natural disasters, but even this focus is motivated by political concerns and not the fate of the common man.
If such ignorance and parochialism continues, Taiwan will be the loser — whoever is in power, and whatever policies are in place.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS