Not much has happened of late in the world of business news that could be considered amusing. Yesterday, however, the bizarre and the grimly comical combined in the story of Taiwanese travel agency ezTravel, whose president had just “discovered” that his company had been taken over by Chinese online travel agency Ctrip.com after the latter acquired a majority of shares through a coalition of investors after years of gradual acquisition.
“While we were aware that Ctrip had been buying our shares in bulk, we did not know the magnitude of Ctrip’s actual holdings until Wednesday,” ezTravel president Jack Yu (游金章) told the Central News Agency on Thursday.
It beggars belief that a company president would not be aware of the component holdings of his company, let alone be taken by surprise by a foreign takeover. Of genuine concern — and worthy of investigation — is the possibility that Yu and his aides deliberately deprived their shareholders of the details of the “actual holdings” — particularly individuals and groups masking their affiliation to Ctrip.com.
This takeover offers a sobering precedent in the ongoing tango between Chinese and Taiwanese investors and the dangers that result from a lack of transparency and accountability on the Taiwanese bourse.
It is a charade that offers real ammunition to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and other voices that are demanding the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) exercise greater caution in formulating cross-strait economic policy.
But before caution, there must be a semblance of competence.
Yesterday, Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) gave an example of just how incompetent Ma’s economic dream team can be. Speaking to Dow Jones Newswires on Thursday, Liu said that the government would consider including the Chinese currency in Taiwan’s foreign exchange (forex) reserves.
The main problem was not that Liu appeared ignorant of the convertibility limitations of the yuan (though that is problem enough), nor that subsequent merging of economic and political risk factors might make this a process fraught with uncertainty.
The main problem, instead, was that Liu spoke on the matter without due care or teamwork, disorientating his staff and sending commentators into a flurry of speculation on whether he was testing the waters or simply proving that chemistry professors-turned-premiers need better economics briefings.
It was especially embarrassing for the government to see the central bank forced to issue a rejoinder on the matter, playing down any hint that the bank was involved in negotiations to include the yuan in its forex reserve line-up.
The impression Liu leaves is one of a government in which ideology and political banalities trump sound, carefully considered policy initiatives that meet the needs of the real world.
Liu has been premier long enough: He ought to know when to sidestep questions from journalists looking to nail the next big policy development. But if he wishes to open up a new topic for consideration in the politics of practical rapprochement, he is going to have to spend a lot more time crafting strategy and learning how to deliver it.
The alternative is leaving Taiwanese vulnerable to people and companies, local and foreign, who know how to exploit incompetent policy and policymakers.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS