Increasing calls from investors, pundits and politicians for immediate government action to help prop up the sagging stock market show that the market has little confidence.
From March 17, when the stock market started to climb before peaking on the eve of the presidential inauguration, investors hoped that things would take a turn for the better and that a rise of 1,289.74 points, or 16.11 percent, on the benchmark TAIEX at that time was only the first indicator of good news to come.
But since May 20, when President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, the TAIEX has plunged by 2,761.6 points, or 30.46 percent, and penetrated both 10-year and 20-year moving averages to close at 6,307.28 points on Friday. This was a fresh two-year low, with market capitalization for all listed companies losing a total of NT$7.4 trillion (US$232.2 billion).
Ma’s remark last week that his “6-3-3” economic policy could not be delivered until 2016 — the final year of a second term in office if he were re-elected — became the last straw for a sinking market as investor confidence fell apart.
With margin calls placing pressure on the market and most local investors choosing to wait in the wings for the time being, and with foreign investors redirecting funds from Asian equity markets — including Taiwan — to home markets amid global uncertainty, it is clear that the market’s bear run will continue for an extended period.
In response to growing public criticism at their do-nothing approach, government officials said they would have an action plan to support the market ready this week, with measures possibly including the use of government funds to purchase a substantial amount of shares, as well as tax exemptions or tax cuts on stock transactions.
There is a strong political case to be made on this point, because many salary earners were drawn into the stock market because of their belief that Ma could fulfill his campaign pledges.
But there is a difference between cutting investor losses and boosting market confidence. It is also clear — if perhaps unwelcome — that these measures cannot be expected to change fundamentals; government intervention will likely only serve to prop up the market temporarily.
The sagging market reflects a bigger picture of global slowdown amid lingering financial turmoil, inflation pressures and exchange-rate volatility. But it is foreign investors continuing to trim positions to meet fund redemptions in home markets that accounts for most of the plunge in local equities.
Remarks by Minister of Finance Lee Sush-der (李述德) last week that investors should take responsibility for investment decisions, and that the government should not shoulder investor losses, is economically accurate but politically incorrect. What he didn’t say was that action to support the market would favor people who invest and not those who don’t.
No one should expect the market to rebound just because of a government “action plan.” The market will eventually act to correct itself as long as the economic outlook is positive and policy improves confidence in the government’s ability to manage.
What investors and the government should worry about is whether a bear run will hurt other capital markets and further undercut domestic consumption before posing a threat to the economy as a whole.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under