Despite the excitement surrounding the Beijing Olympics and the splendor of the opening ceremony, not everything at the Games is quite as it seems.
The little girl seen singing the theme song Ode to the Motherland was in fact lip-synching, because the girl who really sang was deemed not pretty enough. The use of a stand-in to mouth the words was approved by the Communist Party’s Politburo.
When the switch was exposed, government officials ordered a news blackout and had all online reports of it deleted.
Then it was revealed that the TV footage of “giant footprints” over Beijing, seemingly created with fireworks, had been fabricated by computer animation. Even the duet by pianist Lang Lang (郎朗) and a little girl was apparently contrived, since the lid of the grand piano was not even open.
The tricks used at the opening ceremony are not the only part of the Beijing Olympics where appearance is far removed from reality.
The host country did all it could to present itself in the best possible light, sweeping anything that might spoil the view or dampen the spirits under the carpet and suppressing anything and anyone that would not play along.
What the world saw was the greatest investment ever made in physical construction for any Olympic Games. With government leaders from more than 60 countries in attendance, the opening ceremony was indeed spectacular, but the extravaganza was achieved by police state methods.
More than 1 million Beijing residents, migrant workers and petitioners have been forcibly moved or expelled to make way for the Games. Factories in Beijing and surrounding areas have been ordered to suspend or cut production to improve the city’s air quality. Authorities have stepped up monitoring and harassment of dissidents and other unofficial groups.
The great Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn said that totalitarian rule is founded on a framework of violence and falsification.
The more China’s rulers try to show off the country’s image as a military power, the more clearly its totalitarian nature, based on violence and falsification, is visible to all. The Beijing Olympics have been like a mirror, reflecting China’s darker side.
Only fools, the over-excited and those with an ax to grind could fail to see through the sleight of hand. The Olympics’ wart-revealing effect has been all the more obvious with regard to Taiwan. Taiwanese competitors and fans are banned from using their national title, displaying their national flag and singing their national anthem.
Of the more than 200 competing countries, only Taiwan suffers such indignities.
Attending the opening ceremony as invited guests, the current and former chairmen of Taiwan’s ruling party found it acceptable for the Taiwanese team to enter the stadium according to the character zhong (中), meaning China, alongside the “Hong Kong, China” team.
Seeing the title “Chinese Taipei” as a friendly gesture from the other side, the party leaders even declared that Taiwanese athletes enjoyed the “home advantage” in Beijing.
As Mencius said: “What the superior loves, his inferiors will be found to love exceedingly,” and so we have seen other politicians of a similar hue posing as “Chinese ethnic minorities,” applauding China when it harassed and insulted a Taiwanese fan on her way to Beijing, using the Games to bang the drums for unification, and other such buffoonery.
While the mirror of the Olympics reveals the true face of the politicians who are now in charge of Taiwan, forgetting their own status and genuflecting to China at any opportunity, the question is whether Taiwanese are aware and vigilant enough to see what the mirror shows.
When broadcasting Olympic events, some Taiwanese TV stations have cut away for news or commercial breaks at key moments, putting profits above the rights of the viewer. Some broadcasters do not even seem to understand the sports they are covering.
The Taiwanese media’s greedy and conceited attitude is nothing new, but the Beijing Olympics have brought their failings into focus once again.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS