Despite the excitement surrounding the Beijing Olympics and the splendor of the opening ceremony, not everything at the Games is quite as it seems.
The little girl seen singing the theme song Ode to the Motherland was in fact lip-synching, because the girl who really sang was deemed not pretty enough. The use of a stand-in to mouth the words was approved by the Communist Party’s Politburo.
When the switch was exposed, government officials ordered a news blackout and had all online reports of it deleted.
Then it was revealed that the TV footage of “giant footprints” over Beijing, seemingly created with fireworks, had been fabricated by computer animation. Even the duet by pianist Lang Lang (郎朗) and a little girl was apparently contrived, since the lid of the grand piano was not even open.
The tricks used at the opening ceremony are not the only part of the Beijing Olympics where appearance is far removed from reality.
The host country did all it could to present itself in the best possible light, sweeping anything that might spoil the view or dampen the spirits under the carpet and suppressing anything and anyone that would not play along.
What the world saw was the greatest investment ever made in physical construction for any Olympic Games. With government leaders from more than 60 countries in attendance, the opening ceremony was indeed spectacular, but the extravaganza was achieved by police state methods.
More than 1 million Beijing residents, migrant workers and petitioners have been forcibly moved or expelled to make way for the Games. Factories in Beijing and surrounding areas have been ordered to suspend or cut production to improve the city’s air quality. Authorities have stepped up monitoring and harassment of dissidents and other unofficial groups.
The great Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn said that totalitarian rule is founded on a framework of violence and falsification.
The more China’s rulers try to show off the country’s image as a military power, the more clearly its totalitarian nature, based on violence and falsification, is visible to all. The Beijing Olympics have been like a mirror, reflecting China’s darker side.
Only fools, the over-excited and those with an ax to grind could fail to see through the sleight of hand. The Olympics’ wart-revealing effect has been all the more obvious with regard to Taiwan. Taiwanese competitors and fans are banned from using their national title, displaying their national flag and singing their national anthem.
Of the more than 200 competing countries, only Taiwan suffers such indignities.
Attending the opening ceremony as invited guests, the current and former chairmen of Taiwan’s ruling party found it acceptable for the Taiwanese team to enter the stadium according to the character zhong (中), meaning China, alongside the “Hong Kong, China” team.
Seeing the title “Chinese Taipei” as a friendly gesture from the other side, the party leaders even declared that Taiwanese athletes enjoyed the “home advantage” in Beijing.
As Mencius said: “What the superior loves, his inferiors will be found to love exceedingly,” and so we have seen other politicians of a similar hue posing as “Chinese ethnic minorities,” applauding China when it harassed and insulted a Taiwanese fan on her way to Beijing, using the Games to bang the drums for unification, and other such buffoonery.
While the mirror of the Olympics reveals the true face of the politicians who are now in charge of Taiwan, forgetting their own status and genuflecting to China at any opportunity, the question is whether Taiwanese are aware and vigilant enough to see what the mirror shows.
When broadcasting Olympic events, some Taiwanese TV stations have cut away for news or commercial breaks at key moments, putting profits above the rights of the viewer. Some broadcasters do not even seem to understand the sports they are covering.
The Taiwanese media’s greedy and conceited attitude is nothing new, but the Beijing Olympics have brought their failings into focus once again.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS