China's Year of the Rat, which began in February, has produced more than its fair share of shocks for the modern-day mandarins of Beijing. The earthquake that ripped a hole in the heart of the country is but the latest rollercoaster crisis to rock the Chinese leadership's vision of a smoothly advancing 21st century superpower. On this occasion, reports from the disaster zone suggest they have responded well so far.
This was always going to be a big year for China, with the Olympics taking pride of place. Its leaders insist sport and politics do not mix. But the Games have been shamelessly commandeered as a matchless platform on which to celebrate a national coming of age.
Critics of China’s domestic and foreign policies have reacted with similar single-mindedness, most recently turning the Olympic torch relay into a running commentary on Beijing’s behavior in Tibet. The controversy that followed the spring crackdown in Lhasa, in particular the Chinese state media’s ugly abuse of the saint-like Dalai Lama, alienated friends and foes alike.
The mistake has since been recognized and corrected. Like a previous spasm of nationalist ire aimed at perfidious Japan, officially rehabilitated this month as a valued Asian partner, the Tibet rhetoric tap has been quietly turned off. Beijing has agreed to resume talks, albeit limited and largely symbolic, with representatives of Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader. In a similar vein, China is organizing a conference on Darfur next month, apparently to defuse Western criticism of its collaboration with Sudan.
The change of tack, driven to a degree by increasingly unstoppable media and Internet openness, fits a pattern of growing awareness among ruling cadres of the importance of winning the battle of popular perceptions. There was a time, not long ago, when the Communist Party gave not a fig for the world’s opinions or those of China’s peasant masses — and was not afraid to say so. That changed when modernizing technocrat President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) replaced old-school apparatchik Jiang Zemin (江澤民).
Though still a conservative figure in many ways, Hu’s swift reaction to and personal involvement in the relief effort — he convened an emergency meeting of the politburo’s standing committee on Monday evening — accurately reflects his “New China” brand of user-friendly politics. So, too, does the decision to send Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) to Sichuan while simultaneously mobilizing the army.
US President George W. Bush’s Hurricane Katrina debacle, former Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Kursk submarine disgrace and the Myanmar junta’s reckless incompetence have provided helpful lessons on how not to do disasters. China’s leaders will have noticed the extent to which, as in Bush’s case, fumbling at the top at a time of national crisis can destroy political reputation and legitimacy.
Beijing’s unelected and ever more frequently criticized power elite is vulnerable on this score. It needs all the prestige and authority it can muster if it is to ride this latest tiger and the possible aftershocks, political and social.
“The government is responding very quickly despite the difficult wet conditions,” a Chinese official said. “The whole country is pulling together. Rescue teams are pouring in from all over the country. People are queuing to give blood. This is a time of solidarity.”
But the official admitted awkward questions were sure to follow. One focus of attention will be why so many public buildings, especially schools packed with pupils, collapsed so utterly — and whether inadequate or corrupt building practices were partly responsible. Medical teams were also very aware of the post-quake dangers posed by disease and exposure for thousands of homeless people, the official said.
International rows apart, the Year of the Rat has already seen rising strains in China over inflated food and energy prices, corrupt land grabs, ethnic differences and falling export demand. The quake, and its implications for reconstruction, compensation and social cohesion, is the latest blow.
“They [the government] have started well but it could get very difficult for them,” an Asian diplomat said. “They are an authoritarian government, they have not been elected by the people. They will be judged by how they handle the situation. It will be a big test.”
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS