The road ahead for education
It is inspiring to learn that Cheng Jei-cheng (鄭瑞城) has been appointed minister of education after so much controversy. He is obviously qualified to accept this appointment.
After reading Prudence Chou’s (周祝瑛) commentary (“Education minister has homework,” May 2, page 8), I was prompted to endorse her emphasis on establishing an education reform review committee, which should undertake regular reviews of reforms, examine the status quo and adjust policies when required.
As there has been too much anxiety and too many problems since education reforms came into force, I strongly recommend that our new minister of education get a clear understanding of the current situation and prepare for the challenges he will face after taking office on May 20.
Many variables affect our teaching environment and quality of education. Controversies must be resolved as soon as possible on issues such as the adoption of single or multiple versions of textbooks, the implementation of bilingual (English and Chinese) or trilingual (English, Chinese and mother tongue) curriculums and, above all, the maintenance of quality and student numbers in higher education.
The authorities should seek eclectic alternatives and pragmatic solutions to cope with dilemmas that these issues generate. We should also place more emphasis on English proficiency and globalization and develop competence in dealing with competition in the rest of the world.
There should also be more concern for children form problematic families and disadvantaged groups because positive guidance and a good education can steer them away from juvenile delinquency.
Education is the key to enhancing a nation’s international competitiveness, an indispensable capability for surviving in a changing international community. By revitalizing our education system, Taiwanese will be able to cope with the diverse national challenges ahead, political and economic.
Vicky Li
Shulin, Taipei County
Cleaner energy is vital
Earth Day was just two weeks ago. The Environmental Protection Administration marked the event by encouraging people to “campaign against global warming by becoming vegetarians.” Taiwan even has plans to launch a “no car day” to decrease emissions of carbon dioxide. It is not surprising, then, that Taiwanese are quite conscious of the need for cleaner energy and the dangers of global warming.
However, while virtually every other country recognizes the need to reduce reliance on coal-fired electricity generation, Taiwan is on the opposite track.
In fact, Taiwan obtains a surprisingly high proportion of its electricity from coal-fired power plants — the country ranks fifth in the world in per capita terms — despite the fact that such plants are among the leading generators of greenhouse gases.
The prime driver is profit. Taipower, the country’s biggest electricity generator, charges almost twice as much for energy per kilowatt-hour as it costs to obtain from coal, while the cost alone of deriving energy from gas is almost as much as Taipower’s current rate.
This, however, does great damage to the environment: one 4.6 million kilowatt-hour plant in the city of Taichung alone produces more than 60 tonnes of carbon dioxide and 9 tonnes of sulfur dioxide per minute, making it the largest emitter of carbon dioxide of all such plants worldwide, according to Science magazine.
So while the government is actively adopting green policies to encourage people to use renewable energy, Taipower is doing otherwise.
A number of solutions have been offered to more cleanly meet the country’s rising energy needs, with nuclear and renewable alternatives leading the way. Taiwan hosts three nuclear power plants and a fourth is on the way. However, public opposition temporarily halted construction of the fourth plant.
Fortunately, Taiwan has the potential to develop renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. To foster this potential, the government’s Energy Commission provides incentives to users in the form of solar energy subsidies, a policy introduced in 2000.
Through this program, households can receive subsidies covering up to half the cost, while public schools and government agencies are eligible for full reimbursement.
Encouragingly, 4 percent of households already utilize solar energy as part of their total energy consumption.
The government hopes to generate 10 percent of the country’s electricity from renewable sources by 2020.
However, price will remain a conspicuous impediment: Renewable energy fails to be cost-effective, even when taking government subsidies into account.
Therefore, the government ought to develop a clean energy fund to promote the implementation of renewable energy. Funding could come from a fee for Taipower and its competitors for the carbon they emit. The resulting increase in price would more accurately reflect negative externalities, making renewable energy more cost competitive.
It is difficult to find a balance between cheap energy and environmental damage. But Taiwan must realize that sustainable long-term growth can only be based on clean energy generation.
Catherine Pei-ju Tai
Hyattsville, Maryland
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US