“We call it boys’ toys for warfare,” bellows Chris Burgess, as the hip-hop act Stromkern roars Come Armageddon Come from the plasma screen behind him.
On the video a radio-controlled buggy is zipping along a dusty street, its onboard camera swiveling left and right, on the lookout for snipers and roadside bombs that might lie ahead.
Burgess belongs to one of 11 teams unveiled as finalists in the UK Ministry of Defence’s most ambitious –– and unusual –– attempt to bring high-tech science to the frontline. Called the Grand Challenge, the £4 million (US$7.9 million) project calls on engineers to design a robot that can scour an urban area for enemy combatants and explosives and report back, preferably without human intervention.
Among the finalists are a swarm of tiny helicopters that can peer into windows, a flying saucer, and what looks like a scaled-down version of a mechanical diggger. By August the teams, a hodge-podge of defense companies, universities and sixth form colleges, will go head-to-head over three weeks to decide on a winner. The battle will be played out on the streets of Copehill Down, a mock- up of an East German village built in the English countryside during the Cold War.
The competition will test each robot’s ability to go into the village and spot different threats, including snipers, groups of gunmen, armed vehicles and improvised explosive devices. Teams will be docked points for missing threats, being slow and targeting harmless civilians lurking among the buildings.
“It’s a very tough challenge,” said Andy Wallace at the ministry. “They have to deploy, move around by themselves and avoid obstacles, while locating and identifying things that pose a threat before reporting back.”
The challenge is a tacit admission that the large defense companies which provide the British military’s frontline technology rarely come up with the most imaginative ideas.
By throwing open the challenge to all comers the British government aims to tap the brainpower of smaller companies and individual researchers. The idea was pioneered by the Pentagon, whose own Grand Challenge was set up to encourage new technology for driverless vehicles.
The winner will receive the RJ Mitchell trophy, named after the father of the Spitfire World War II fighter plane and molded from metal recycled from one of the fighters. Those who perform best will get backing from the ministry to turn their robots into gadgets that will support soldiers in the future.
Team Mira, one of the finalists backed by BAE Systems and involving students from the Royal Grammar school in Guildford, south of London, has built a ground-based buggy that uses a laser scanner, thermal imaging and cameras to scan the streets for signs of danger. To check rooftops and other inaccessible areas the buggy automatically launches a flying saucer-like vehicle that can hover over buildings and send images back to base.
“It’s a bit like Wacky Races,” team member Richard Adams said.
Another of the finalists, Swarm Systems, is putting its faith in eight “quadrotors” –– small, flat helicopters the size of dinner plates that will fly into the village in formation and beam back video and sound. Microphones built into the aerial vehicles filter out everything except voices. The helicopters are designed to take off autonomously and can fly a few meters above the ground.
“We’re working on a version that you’ll just pull out of your bag and throw into the air,” said Owen Holland, an engineer on the team from Essex University. “Hopefully it’s not going to give anyone a haircut.”
At Bruton school for girls in Somerset, three students joined the Silicon Valley team to develop surveillance vehicles for the challenge. The team plumped for a powered glider, a hot air balloon and a kite. The balloon and kite will be tethered and carry cameras high above the village, while the plane feeds back live video to glasses worn by its operator.
Burgess, of the Mindsheet team, says they hope to enter several robotic cars in the final that automatically drive to vantage points before beaming video of the village back to base. In his view many of the finalists’ robots are too elaborate for war zones.
“A lot of these teams have got flying machines or big vehicles, but they’ll be on eBay within minutes of arriving in Afghanistan,” he said. “And with ours, you could put some P4 explosive on the back, drive it into a compound and detonate it. It’s fun and gets the job done.”
Wallace, who says the ministry anticipates an “enjoyable and fun event,” said: “Each of the teams has something unique and interesting.”
“If we see something we like we’ll either make them an offer or find another way to help them develop the technology,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past