There is a transitional stage in life called adolescence, during which teenagers tend to be rebellious. Most people enter puberty in their early teens. With inculcation from many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) elders, president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) finally began his “adolescence” by rebelling against those same uncles last month by appointing former Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) legislator Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) to be Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chairwoman.
Former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is one of those KMT elders. His first visit to China a few years ago defused the long-standing political crisis between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Lien appears to have monopolized control over the relations between China and Taiwan ever since. On the other side of the Taiwan Strait, his position is unchallengeable and irreplaceable.
However, Ma is a president elected by more than 7 million people. Even without all the votes from Taipei City, he still obtained more votes than Lien did four years ago. So how could Ma possibly stand having such a person above him?
Since cross-strait relations must be the KMT’s main focus in the next four years, there will not be considerable improvement on such domestic issues as commodity price hikes, economic growth, education, human rights or unemployment rates, no matter what the perspective. Therefore, Ma has to take the lead on cross-strait policy.
With these pressing reasons, his delayed adolescence has thus been launched.
Ma has said he chose Lai to be the council chairwoman in an attempt to incorporate voices from the pro-independence green camp on the cross-strait issue in order to build a national consensus.
However, this argument is untenable.
First, if Ma thinks that Taiwan should not develop too close a relationship with China and that the cross-strait relations should not be hastily handled, he could have brought that up before the election instead of using Lai to cool down disputes afterwards.
Second, Lai recently said that she completely supports the KMT’s cross-strait policies. This means that she supports such policies as the so-called “1992 consensus,” “one China with different interpretations,” direct transport links, opening Taiwan to Chinese tourism, removal of the 40 percent cap on China-bound investment and allowing the exchange of the Chinese currency.
This raises the question of how Lai will represent a different voice in the new Cabinet, whether her presence will help Ma build a consensus and promote reconciliation, and whether the appointment of Lai really will mollify the 5.44 million who voted for the pan-green ticket.
Reconciliation, shared pan-green and pan-blue government, and a diversity of opinion on cross-strait policy are all based on the precondition that Lai remains the same old Lai. Yet, obviously, this is no longer the case.
People should not forget the press conference co-hosted by Lai and Straits Exchange Foundation chairman-designate Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) last week. Their interaction was definitely one of the most hypocritical in Taiwan’s political history, and a keen expose of political affectations.
The press conference highlighted the KMT’s modus operendi — if a position of power is on offer, past insurmountable misgivings will be forgotten and everyone will be happy.
Various events following the presidential election have all demonstrated that the old KMT is back.
From the old faces in Ma’s Cabinet, to the impending incarceration of Yu Wen (余文), a clerk, for involvement in Ma’s special funds case, to the decision by Soochow University to limit the appearance of its professors on TV talk shows, as orchestrated by premier-designate Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), to Chiang Lien-fu’s (江連福) being found not guilty of vote-buying, to the appointment of Lai — each example indicates that the KMT from eight years ago is back in business.
Soochow University’s action appears on the surface to be an attempt to limit the academic freedom of professors, but underneath the proposal was the first step of attempts to control the media.
The verdict of innocence for Chiang is really a permit for the KMT’s local factions to continue their entanglements in money and power.
The same logic applies to Lai’s appointment: on the surface, Ma wants to use a supporter of Taiwanese independence to cancel out pan-green voters’ doubts. However, it is really a teenage Ma using Cabinet appointments to engage in party in-fighting.
In another 10 days or so, we will see the return of old men running the state, where subordinates take the blame for superiors, with the media under tight control, a complicit legal system, a corrupt political scene and vicious party in-fighting.
The only difference is that Ma, who previously avoided involvement, now has entered his teenage years.
Now that this 59-year-old teenage rebel intends to lead an old fogy of a party that is the KMT into delivering their political report card I believe that the Taiwanese are ready with their red markers in hand.
Yao Jen-to is special assistant to the chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party.
Translated by Ted Yang and Angela Hong
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers