The Chinese video addressed “all you bashers” who criticized China’s crackdown on Tibetan protesters and their sympathizers, asserting “Tibet WAS, IS and ALWAYS WILL BE a part of China.” The producers said that the disturbances in Tibet were not riots but outbursts of terror.
There followed scene after scene with belligerent commentary laced with sarcasm and personal attacks, peppered with a sprinkling of foul words not fit for a family newspaper, including liberal use of the “F” word.
The Chinese government, while often objecting to critical reports as being “interference in the internal affairs of China,” rarely hesitates to hurl invective at other nations.
In this case, the Chinese have outdone themselves, especially in blasting foreign media coverage of dissent in Tibet and demonstrations along the Olympic torch relay making its way to Beijing.
The angry campaign seems well coordinated. The official Beijing Olympic Web site overlooks most of the protests. The Xinhua news agency and the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s newspaper, are defensive but calm while reporting events.
It is in the Internet blogs that the heat really gets turned up. In particular, one called “anti-CNN.com” claims that it was set up by “volunteers” not connected with the government “to expose the lies and distortions in the Western media.” Whoever runs the blog contends: “We are not against the Western people, but against the prejudice from the Western society.”
None of the Chinese outlets explains how they, or ordinary Chinese, know about what is broadcast or said by the foreign TV and press when relatively few Chinese see foreign media reports. It suggests that Chinese embassies abroad are vacuuming up everything negative that is reported about China as their rebuttals are aimed at reports in English, German, French and Spanish.
CNN is China’s No. 1 target, highlighted by the blog named “anti-CNN.” The network has been labeled “a famous liar with most advanced technology,” “Chinese Negative News” or the “Cheating News Network.”
In particular, Chinese lawyers and government officials pointed to opinions expressed by a CNN commentator, Jack Cafferty, who said in a broadcast: “I think they’re basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they’ve been for the last 50 years.”
China does not have a constitutional First Amendment that permits such judgments to be aired.
Fourteen lawyers filed suit in a Beijing court against CNN this week, asserting they had suffered mental distress. The Chinese government has demanded a “sincere apology.”
Entries on blogs have urged the government to throw CNN correspondents out of the country and to ban network broadcasts inside China, where it has only limited access to the foreign community.
CNN is not alone. Fox News is named for “a cunning animal.” Agence France-Presse, the large wire service based in Paris, “lies.” The BBC and a German newspaper are described in offensive terms that ought not to be repeated here.
As might be expected, the Dalai Lama is often attacked personally. But others are also objects of ire, including the US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who has sponsored resolutions critical of China, and US Assistant Secretary of State Paula Dobriansky, the State Department’s coordinator of Tibetan affairs, who was termed “ignorant” and a teller of “a bare-faced lies.”
It will be interesting to see how Beijing deals with the foreign media as the Olympics approach. The Beijing Olympic committee says it expects 21,600 accredited journalists, of whom 16,000 will be broadcasters. Another 10,000 non-accredited journalists are also expected.
The president of the Beijing organizing committee, Liu Qi (劉淇), said in the preface of a 264-page media guide: “The freedom of foreign journalists in their news coverage will also be ensured.”
Since journalists can be a rambunctious lot and CCP is, if nothing else, obsessed with control, this could make for an explosive mix.
There were hints this week that some Chinese were beginning to worry that their rants might have gone too far. The People’s Daily called on Chinese to act like gentlemen with “a graceful bearing and an open mind.”
Said a Chinese in a blog posting: “Instead of reasonably and calmly discussing the position and why it may not be correct, I have seen many Chinese people resort to childish name-calling and angry rhetoric.”
“These rude Chinese,” the blog writer concluded, “are making China look bad.”
Richard Halloran is a writer base in Hawaii.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS