The amendment I have proposed to Article 17 of the Income Tax Law (所得稅法) would allow taxpayers and their spouses to claim deductions on their junior college or university tuition fees. This was attacked as a tactic to please voters through tax-cutting measures. I feel that I should raise a few arguments in defense of this proposal. This amendment originated with a student who was simultaneously working and attending evening school. He said that because he earned a salary, he needed to make an individual income tax filing. However, as per tax regulations, he would not be able to claim his tuition fees as a special deduction.
Last year the Ministry of Finance looked into an amendment that sought to increase the deduction that parents could claim for their children’s tuition costs. However, this amendment failed to include tuition fees that taxpayers incurred themselves.
Not just evening school students, but quite a few postgraduate students also face the same problem. Most of them have not yet married or had children, but are working while going to school and are financially independent. However, not only do they pay their tuition, but they are also unable to deduct it from their income tax filing. Moreover, since they earn an income, they cannot be considered dependents of their parents and so their parents cannot claim their tuition as deductions either. Conversely, if the students do not work and are living with their parents, their tuition fees would then be eligible as a deduction.
These diligent work/study students may not earn high salaries and some come from financially shaky family backgrounds, but they are unable to receive any compensation. On the other hand, students who are supported by their parents usually enjoy a more stable financial situation at home, yet they are eligible for tuition reimbursement from the government. This kind of policy will only end up benefiting the rich.
The current reimbursement system actually provides a disincentive for people to invest in themselves. The Ministry of Finance encourages the public to invest in stocks and offshore mutual funds, but discourages them from improving themselves through further studies. This really is a strange state of affairs.
If the personal tuition costs of taxpayers could be claimed as deductions, not only would that provide economic relief to quite a few postgraduate and evening-school students, many of those taking professional training courses would also benefit. These students have gone back to school to improve their skills. This is what self-investment is all about. This also improves the nation’s global competitiveness.
As the government always talks about encouraging people to engage in continuous education, shouldn’t it provide help for that through tax exemption policy?
I had previously queried the ministry on these two issues, but it did not provide any clear response. In private I heard that this was because of its worries over the tax base shrinking. Actually, not that many people are both students and taxpayers, so this amendment would not affect the tax base very much. The ministry’s opposition is most likely merely the result of the attachment that government organizations have for the old, fossilized system.
Since the ministry is unwilling to research this matter itself, it is my duty as a legislator to take the lead in amending the Income Tax Law so that the government’s goodwill is applied to those who truly need the reimbursements and that the government’s encouragement of citizens to invest in themselves are not just empty words.
Chen Chi-yu is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY JAMES CHEN
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past