Your editorial (“Are they sending the Marines?” April 22, page 8) implies that the US is trying to “justify” its presence in the region by intentionally stoking cross-strait tensions by stationing marines in the new American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) complex.
While conspiracy theories and US bashing are always crowd pleasers, there is an alternative explanation: With the KMT and vice president-elect Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) throwing themselves at the feet of the Chinese Communist Party even before taking office, a symbolic upgrading of AIT into a real embassy sends the signal that US support for Taiwanese sovereignty remains steadfast.
The US has always supported a strong and confident Taiwan as critical to cross-strait peace. If there is any symbolic meaning to the timing of the AIT ad, it is not to stoke cross-strait tensions (please be serious), but to give Taiwan the confidence to continue to engage China economically.
Or, more probably, the pencil-pusher at the US State Department responsible for construction procurements is not an expert on the delicacies of cross-strait relations.
If the US really wanted to create cross-strait tension, it could just support Taiwan’s UN and WHO applications, which your editors think is such a great idea. After Taiwan is reduced to rubble in the ensuing war, the US could maintain its influence in the region by stationing as much military hardware as it pleased among the smoldering wreckage.
Peter Cranston
Washington
Testees left in the dark
The Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (SC-TOP) was established by the Ministry of Education to develop and promote an effective Chinese assessment system, the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (TOP), for Chinese learners worldwide to assess their Chinese proficiency.
Unfortunately, SC-TOP does not provide the most basic of resources for test takers. There is only one mock test available for each level and the only word list consists of 8,000 words with no translations in any language. The words are listed in order of complexity and are useless for lower-level test takers.
China’s Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi has word lists available for different levels.
TOP has been running since 2003. Why aren’t these resources available for TOP test takers?
Jeffrey Campbell
Lujhou, Taipei County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with