Your editorial (“Are they sending the Marines?” April 22, page 8) implies that the US is trying to “justify” its presence in the region by intentionally stoking cross-strait tensions by stationing marines in the new American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) complex.
While conspiracy theories and US bashing are always crowd pleasers, there is an alternative explanation: With the KMT and vice president-elect Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) throwing themselves at the feet of the Chinese Communist Party even before taking office, a symbolic upgrading of AIT into a real embassy sends the signal that US support for Taiwanese sovereignty remains steadfast.
The US has always supported a strong and confident Taiwan as critical to cross-strait peace. If there is any symbolic meaning to the timing of the AIT ad, it is not to stoke cross-strait tensions (please be serious), but to give Taiwan the confidence to continue to engage China economically.
Or, more probably, the pencil-pusher at the US State Department responsible for construction procurements is not an expert on the delicacies of cross-strait relations.
If the US really wanted to create cross-strait tension, it could just support Taiwan’s UN and WHO applications, which your editors think is such a great idea. After Taiwan is reduced to rubble in the ensuing war, the US could maintain its influence in the region by stationing as much military hardware as it pleased among the smoldering wreckage.
Peter Cranston
Washington
Testees left in the dark
The Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (SC-TOP) was established by the Ministry of Education to develop and promote an effective Chinese assessment system, the Test of Proficiency-Huayu (TOP), for Chinese learners worldwide to assess their Chinese proficiency.
Unfortunately, SC-TOP does not provide the most basic of resources for test takers. There is only one mock test available for each level and the only word list consists of 8,000 words with no translations in any language. The words are listed in order of complexity and are useless for lower-level test takers.
China’s Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi has word lists available for different levels.
TOP has been running since 2003. Why aren’t these resources available for TOP test takers?
Jeffrey Campbell
Lujhou, Taipei County
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at