Public protests against rising food and fuel prices in Haiti, in the Carribean Sea, have grown increasingly heated.
With a death toll of five, the violence is still expanding. On April 7, tens of thousands of people took to the street in the capital, Port-au-Prince.
On April 8, starving masses attempted to storm the presidential palace, demanding the resignation of President Rene Preval.
Such a crisis does not develop overnight: Problems in Haiti have been a long time in the making. For more than a hundred years, the Haitian government and public have been destroying the environment they depend on for their livelihood, and the consequences of their actions were inevitable. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan.
Haiti and the neighboring Dominican Republic are two parts of the island of Hispaniola, located to the east of Cuba in the Caribbean Sea. Both countries were European colonies and endured authoritarian rule for prolonged periods of time.
For decades after the 1930s, the Dominican Republic was governed by dictator Rafael Trujillo and later by Joaquin Balaguer.
The country’s approach to environmental protection was very different from that of Haiti resulting in the strong contrast that exists today.
Looking down from a plane, Haiti has a light yellow tinge and is covered in deforested hills, while the Dominican Republic is a luscious green and covered in vegetation.
Jared Diamond, a University of California, Los Angeles professor of geography and physiology who won the Pulitzer Prize in 1998 and the Aventis Prize for his book Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, spent an entire chapter of his 2005 book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed on detailed descriptions and comparisons of these two countries.
Taiwan has developed a lot in the past five or six decades. At the same time, the country’s environment has been greatly damaged.
With president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) set to be inaugurated on May 20, some people have voiced concern that staffers in the Ma camp value development over environmental protection and that Ma and his team will neglect environmental issues.
I suggest that Ma and his advisers pay more attention to this issue and adopt a long-term approach.
In this respect, the Ma government should follow the Dominican Republic’s example, not Haiti’s.
I also hope that the public will monitor the new government to help protect the lifeblood of Taiwan’s sustainable existence so future generations will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of Taiwan’s mountains and streams.
We need to protect the beautiful island on which we all depend.
Wang Chih-shao is a high school physics teacher.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
RSS