President-elect Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) last campaign ad prior to the presidential election used the slogan “We are ready!”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was ready to win, but two weeks after that victory, Ma doesn’t seem prepared for the responsibilities he will soon shoulder.
To show his willingness to mend US-Taiwan relations, Ma said after his victory that he wanted to visit the US before his inauguration.
As Ma had not consulted with Washington over the issue, his remarks put the US in an awkward position and neither side seems to know how to handle the situation.
One of Ma’s election promises was to set up chartered cross-strait weekend flights and he wants to fulfill this promise and open the nation to Chinese tourism as soon as possible. But the deadline he has set for this— the first weekend of July — is proving difficult for the agencies that handle cross-strait contacts, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Straits Exchange Foundation. These organizations are still administered by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Ma’s team can do nothing until he takes office.
Airline industry representatives handling aviation talks have also complained that Ma is pushing too hard and too fast for changes and thereby undermining the nation’s negotiating advantages, while the military says that plans to operate cross-strait flights out of Taipei Songshan Airport could impinge on national security.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has the upper hand on many cross-strait issues. The CCP may prove more willing to show goodwill toward Ma than to the DPP, but there will still be limitations. Beijing will not back down on blocking Taiwan from securing observer status at the WHO, even if Ma offers to use the title “Chinese Taipei.” In any case, Ma is jumping the gun on these issues and undermining the outgoing administration’s application using the name “Taiwan.”
There are many issues to deal with in cross-strait relations and there is no need for Ma to bring up the issue of sovereignty before he has even been inaugurated, especially when doing so runs counter to his election pledges.
Former National Security Bureau secretary-general Ting Yu-chou (丁渝洲) has said that Ma’s actions and remarks since the election have broken his promise to be a humble president serving the interests of the public. Several unwise statements have been particularly unhelpful.
It seems that Ma is still in campaign mode, still focusing on wooing the public with promises. But Ma must realize that the public is already holding him to presidential standards. He must exhibit a capacity for caution and strategic thinking — the smallest indiscretion could have domestic and international repercussions.
Ma’s honeymoon will be short. Those with high expectations will want to see quick and concrete results, while opponents will be waiting to pounce on his every mistake.
From now on, Ma will be under constant scrutiny from all sides. His first step should be to listen more, say less and be cautious.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS