There have been reports that president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that the changing of the name of Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall (中正紀念堂) was illegal and was therefore invalid, and that a consensus on whether it should be changed back should be sought through a public poll. The name change, however, was a political issue rather than a legal issue, and needs to be solved with tact and political wisdom rather than by judicial means. The goal is to dispel social conflict rather than determine a certain procedure. There’s a time for everything, and it would be a pity if Ma doesn’t understand that.
Moreover, the fact that Ma won a landslide victory means that the public has high expectations of him. As Max Weber said, a politician should be equipped with not only the ethic of ultimate ends but also the ethic of responsibility. If the new president hides behind polls, claiming that he is just following public opinion, he would demonstrate a lack of courage. He would be wrong to suppresses the minority opinion with the majority opinion, thus repressing the memories of one group with the memories of another group.
More importantly, if he failed to honor his campaign promises, he would be dishonest. Social fractures need to be mended and a political direction needs to be established. Ma’s call to revert to the old name shows a lack of deliberation.
If mending social cleavages and mapping out a political direction are the top priorities of the next government, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should not seek revenge for the smallest grievance and throw the country into a vicious circle of infighting. Instead, it must have the wisdom and stature to shoulder the task left by its predecessor.
In pursuit of realistic political interests, one can’t just change things based on political affiliation; and at the level of political symbolism, one can’t just seek shortsighted solutions and pour salt on opponents’ wounds.
The question is whether this election will help Taiwan move away from ethnic conflict, which is what the public wants. This will depend on whether there will be a new political direction conforming to principles of justice. If Ma and his government incorporate this in their mission, they should accept the historical mistakes and thus accept that the inscription of dazhong zhizheng (大中至正) — which only served to glorify one person — was changed to “Liberty Square.”
Not only should Ma accept the name change, he should also promote liberty, equality and fraternity. For example, with the increasing income gap, wouldn’t it be better to change the name of Da-an Forest Park to “Equality Forest Park?” Also, wouldn’t it be better if we change the name of the 228 Peace Park to the “228 Philanthropy Park?”
If we made these changes, liberty, equality and fraternity would shine over Taipei. Since these values are still lacking in Taiwan’s society, I can cherish the memories of the contemporary Chinese revolution as well as the efforts and sacrifice of the tangwai (outside the party) democratic pioneers. Maybe it could also make the public question and evaluate themselves by asking if we really are free, equal and altruistic, thus making ethnic hatred gradually disappear and give way to a greater sense of shared ethics. Who is to say that Liberty Square and the promotion of liberty, equality and fraternity aren’t appropriate?
Of course, if the next government turns out to be just like the outgoing government, engaging in name changes as soon as it takes power, failing to listen to the public or enact progressive policies, then nothing will have changed. People have been listening to Ma since the presidential election. After May 20 they will be watching to see what he does.
Chao Kang is a sociology professor at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS